soc.history.war.misc

Here's a link with current, relevance. .
http://911wasahoax.blogspot.com/2006/08/rothschilds-top-of-food-chain-and-are.html

We are not as interested in old history, which you claim could be
false. So what. Please note the errors in points presented from the
above link. Current history.

TIA



On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:53:50 -0400, Cory Albrecht
wrote:

>nospam wrote, on 2008/03/27 05:32:
>> I think ~thewitness provided a good link. Can you disprove any fact
>> on the list?
>
>What facts? All I see are a load of bare assertions with no proofs to
>back them up.
>
>E.g. "Mayer Amschel Bauer, born Frankfurt, Germany, the son of Moses
>Amschel Bauer, a money lender and the proprietor of a counting house.
>Over the entrance door he places a red sign. This sign is a six pointed
>star (which geometrically and numerically translates into the number
>666) which under Rothschild instruction will end up on the Israeli flag
>some two centuries later."
>
>First, it was Mayer's father, Moses Amschel Bauer, who hung a sign of a
>red shield out to identify his store (Charles Mosley, Burke's Peerage
>and Baronetage, 107th edition, volume 3, p. 415), not Mayer. So that's
>one assertion shown to be wrong. Actually three false assertions, since
>it was a sign of a shield, not a six pointed red star. Remember,
>"Rothschild", which Mayer changed his last name to, means "red shield"
>in German,and the third being that Mayer was not born until 1744.
>
>And that bit about how a six pointed star "geometrically and numerically
>translates" into 666? Numerology does not equal facts.
>
>Also, where is the proof that this implied Star of David was placed on
>the Israeli flag on Rothschild say so? Oh, there is that supposed list
>of sources, however there are no proper references to tell us which
>supposed fact came from which supposed source. Even a high school
>history teacher would give it a failing grade for just that.
>
>Remember - iamthewitness is the one who made the claim that the
>Rothschilds control virtually all the world's central banks, therefore
>it is up to him/her to prove that claim. It is not up to me to disprove
>it. Even so, look how easy it was for me to point out 5 major problems
>with his kooky conspircy theory.
>
>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:03:06 -0400, Cory Albrecht
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Oh look! No facts yet again, just mounds of unproven assertions. Can you
>>> say "kook"?
>
>>> ? iamthewitness.com ? wrote, on 2008/03/26 20:03:
>>>> The History of the House of Rothschild
>>>> http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewcommentary.php?storyid=121
>>>>
>>
>>
>> The more I know, the more I know - I don't know.
>
>Just make sure that what you know is actually the truth, not unproven
>assertions made by people like iamthewitness who can't even get their
>facts straight.

The more I know, the more I know - I don't know.