ohara...@mindspring.com wrote:
>
> Basically, start with the premise that the USA subs at the beginning
> of WW2 had good torpedoes, or at least as good as they were supposed
> to be. How would the war have been different?
Question: Why is today's (last 20 years or so) most common slang term
for torpedoes, "torp(s)", when the most common WWII slang term for
torpedoes, was "fish"?