soc.history.war.world-war-ii

aspqrz@pacific.net.au (Phil McGregor) wrote:
>
> "Scott M. Kozel" wrote:
> > aspqrz@pacific.net.au (Phil McGregor) wrote:
> >> "Scott M. Kozel" wrote:
> >>
> >> >Creative snippage restored:
> >> >'No, you haven't posted relevant quotes that show what exactly they
> >> >said that wasn't true, that rose above the level of "typical POW
> >> >misstatements", to the level of something that would suggest "evidence
> >> >of a war crime/piracy."'

> >> Really? Then I can only suggest that you have failed to read my posts.
> >
> >I have read your posts.

Here he goes with his creative snipping again ...

Creative snippage restored:
'I have read your posts. You have not posted what I asked for above;
and even if you had and I somehow missed it, it should be easy enough
for you to repost it.'

> So you *say* ... and so you have *said* to all the other posters you
> cannot understand ...
>
> Yet the evidence, plain as day, is that you have *not* read the posts.
>
> Or, perhaps, I am being unkind ... maybe you *have* read them, and
> were unable to understand them.

Or, perhaps, you never have posted what I asked for above.

> If you want to waffle on, fine ...

That is what you are doing, Phil. It is disappointing that you won't
post your argument.

I made a simple request that you post a response to my statement (at top
of this post), which would be an easy cut-and-paste if you actually had
posted it as you are claiming.