soc.history.war.world-war-ii

Stephen Graham wrote:
>
> Scott M. Kozel wrote:
> > Stephen Graham wrote:
> >
> > You made the claim that my conventional statement was incorrect.
> >
> > If you have a rebuttal, you need to post it here for all of us to see.
> > If you won't, then you are just playing a game, and not adding to the
> > thread's discussion.
>
> Scott,
>
> None of what you've said is an accurate depiction of what we understand
> regarding Sydney and Kormoran. OK, the 1500 meter distance at the start
> of gunfire is in accord with the survivors' reports.
>
> Now, why are you unwilling to read the eight page account?

Why are you unwilling to post the URL and a few pertinent excerpts?
Telling a poster that they are 'wrong' and that the correct material is
somewhere on the Internet, is not a rebuttal, and is not debate.

If you will go back to my original statement 4 of my posts upthead, you
will see that was a reply to you, concerning the general procedure for
confronting a suspected raider, not specific to Sydney and Kormoran.