soc.history.war.world-war-ii

asp...@pacific.net.au (Phil McGregor) wrote:
>
> "Scott M. Kozel" wrote:
>
> >You advance the insinuation that they lied, and then you seemingly pull
> >it back.
>
> No. You can't seem to grasp that I am pointing out that there are
> possible reasons *why* they may have lied.
>
> Which are, essentially, as unprovable as your claims that they told
> the pure unvarnished truth.

There you go again. I have not claimed that the Kormoran crew "told
the pure unvarnished truth."

I merely think that accusations of war crimes is a very serious
matter, and that unless there is clear evidence of such, that the
default position should be that they did not commit war crimes.