Group: soc.history.war.world-war-ii
From: Rich
Date: Monday, March 03, 2008 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: Early Kursk

On Mar 3, 11:21 am, "Andrew Clark"
wrote:
(snip most of the latest ad hominem attack)
> Anyone happy to pontificate at length in this forum about German archival
> sources ought to know this sort of thing already.

I see, and yet you can pontificate at length without anyone
questioning you, but cannot give a simple answer such as, Yelton, JMH,
64/4 or Rossino, H&GS, 11/3? Are those the articles you were speaking
to?

So when did asking for information become a vigorous attack on your
statements Andrew? Note that I replied to your request for
information, "Do you know whether this applies to the sort of
documents you are quoting here? I am more aware of the editing in the
political and social fields than the military." by questioning whether
such a practice would be practical for the ***military*** and citing
the reasons why, Louis did the same. And we both then asked for
information from you regarding what you had found on "the editing in
the political and social fields". You replied with a vague litany of
last names, article title fragments, and partial references to
journals, accompanied by an unwarranted torrent of abuse that has now
continued through four posts?

Just how has your abusive conduct furthered your knowledge of how that
practice may have applied to military documents or our knowledge of
how it may have applied to political and social documents, or for that
matter, **anyones** knowledge of **anything**? Or are you here just to
score juvenile debating points?

Safety Articles | News in English | 20lbs in 30 days | Bluegrass | Usenet Newsfeeds