Group: soc.history.war.world-war-ii
From: "Hal Hanig"
Date: Friday, February 29, 2008 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: B-26 Marauder not as good as the B-25?

Branek wrote:
> "Bombardier" wrote in message
> news:8bcd5d38-0502-45bc-b84c-0c0d601997aa@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Those of us who actually flew all our missions in a B-26 would
>> respectfully disagree with all you have said
>>
>> Arthur Kramer
>> 344th Bomb Group 494th Bomb Squadron
>> England France Belgium Holland Italy Germany
>> www.coastcomp.com/artkramer
>>
>
> The specs I had read on the B-25 indicated it had more range than the
> B-26,
> a faster cruising speed and carried a larger bomb load (this was from
> wikipedia).

I'm sure that Art has no more idea of the real reason for the change in the
ETO than I have.....he more likely is just telling us what the B-26 guys
were saying at the time which may or may not have been accurate. I'd sure
like to hear what the guys in the B-25 outfits that were moved had to say
about their PCS to the MTO.