Group: sci.physics.electromag
From: a_plutonium
Date: Thursday, March 06, 2008 12:29 PM
Subject: #92 accounting of Electrical Reactance in these experiments; new textbook: "How Superconductivity really works; nanosecond Capacitor discharge current"

Resistivity plus Reactance gives Impedance in electricity.

In my experiments of the DC circuit and AC circuit and how a magnet
reacts to those two currents as a Meissner
Effect, I am going to have to take into account the Reactance.

If I have a AC circuit and I make a coil of part of the circuit and
place inside that coil a magnet or merely
just a different piece of metal from the circuit wire, that I will
have a decrease in voltage.

The theme of this book is this:

Superconduction Current is equal to a Capacitor Current

So if I discover that a Capacitor Current of a Wimshurst generator can
achieve a Meissner Effect.
Or that a Van de Graaff generator can achieve a Meissner Effect
routinely by "hair-raising levitation".
But that there is no Meissner Effect in ordinary DC current nor is
there in ordinary AC current circuits.

However, I have to be careful as to explain that a coil in a AC
current circuit may display a pseudo Meissner
Effect which is really simply that of Reactance.

So far these experiments show that there is no effect of a magnet on
DC current as to yielding a Meissner
Effect. And there is no effect of a magnet on AC current as to
yielding a Meissner Effect, however there is
a Reactance Effect if the circuit has a coil in it.

So that Reactance is not a Meissner Effect.

There is a effect when tiny metal shavings of iron that is slightly
magnetic is placed on a Capacitor Current
of a Wimshurst generator so that the iron shavings display a Meissner
Effect.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies