sci.physics.electromag

We know that superconduction currents are diamagnetic, at least some
superconduction currents are such,
but since there is more than likely type III superconductors and type
IV superconductors that we may not
yet realize or understand how far diamagnetism plays in defining
superconduction.

We do not know the full extent of applying diamagnetism to what is
superconduction currents.

The message of this post is to clearly outline the major difference
between a DC current and AC current
compared to a Capacitor-Current.

The Wimshurst Generator Experiment proves that the Superconduction
Current is the same as a
Capacitor Current in that both display diamagnetism.

That Experiment says : Capacitor Current = Superconduction Current

So that a lightning bolt current is a superconduction current since it
is a Capacitor current, but
we do not know as of yet whether a lightning bolt is diamagnetic or to
what extent it is
diamagnetic.

A current that is either AC or DC current is one in which the
electrons at one end of the circuit
cause the electrons at the other end of the circuit to move. So that
in a DC or AC current we
have what can be called "messenger electrons" and they message at the
speed of light. We
can call this "photon messengers" telling the electrons at the other
end of a circuit to move.
So that the current is not the motion of a electron moving at the full
distance of the circuit
to create a current.

A Capacitor Current is different from the DC and AC current because
the individual electrons
actually move the entire distance of the circuit. They move at nearly
the speed of light but a
little short of that speed (since electrons, remember, have a tiny bit
of mass).

So this major difference may not sound like much of a difference to
most people, that the
electrons in a DC or AC current do not move the full distance of the
circuit but communicate
to the opposite end of the circuit for the electrons at that end to
move. Whereas the electrons
in a Capacitor current actually move that entire distance of the
circuit.

Crude Analogy: we have a garden hose of a long distance and it was
full from the last time we
used it so that when we turn on the water, the water at the faucet
communicates to the water
at the other end to come out of the hose. But when the hose is brand
new and thus empty of
water, we have to wait until the hose is full of water before we have
a steady flow at the end.

So it may seem to alot of people that a difference of whether a
current has photon
messenger telling the electrons at the other end to move is not much
of a difference from
a current in which the electrons at one end actually do circumnavigate
to the other end. But that
is a very large difference indeed and such a big difference that it
creates the difference of
"no resistance" and "some resistance" and it creates the difference of
"diamagnetism"
compared to "nondiamagnetism".

Now most every one would be confused here in that they would think
that electrons that travel the
entire distance of the circuit could never be "no resistance". But in
fact that is the case and the
solving of that confusion is the idea that electrons in Quantum
Mechanics in orbits do not have
resistance or friction. So when we have electrons moving the entire
distance in a superconductor
such as mercury at 4 Kelvin, those electrons are simply moving in one
orbit of a mercury atom
rather than another orbit. So the electrons in superconduction are
merely in higher orbits and atomic
orbits are friction free and resistance free.

Now in chemistry there are at least three different types of bonds:
(1) ionic
(2) covalent
(3) metallic

And in physics there are at least three different types of magnetism:
(1) ferromagnetism
(2) paramagnetism
(3) diamagnetism

Now in physics there are at least three different types of electrical-
currents:
(1) DC
(2) AC
(3) Capacitor-current

Now, the intriguing question is, whether those categories match up? Is
ferromagnetism a form
of Capacitor-current which is a form of covalent bond? You see the
question that I am raising
is a very abstract question which most people would not understand the
question. The question
I am raising is the different forms of bond and magnetism and electric
currents are related
and some are related more to others, so that a matching up of bonds to
magnetism to currents
is do-able.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies