sci.physics.electromag

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

>
> (1) Experiment with Wimshurst generator shows that a Meissner type of
> effect is obtained
> (2) Experiment with several superconductor materials hooked up in
> series or parallel with the temperature of the coldest
> Tc, that the behaviour of the resultant end current is a Capacitor
> discharge current, varying as to the arrangement
> of the different superconductors. If BCS were true then it would not
> matter how the superconductors
> were arranged for the end current would all be the same.
> (3) Experiment where we match the Wimshurst discharge current by a
> interrupted-DC-current
> and then we make a Wimshurst out of a superconductor material and
> match the other two. The
> fact that all three can be matched proves they are one and the same.


The first two of those above experiments are clear enough. But the
third
is very vague and obscure. What I meant to say was that if
Superconductivity
is a Capacitor current where in nanoseconds of time the capacitor
charges up
and then in another nanosecond of time discharges so that we view the
superconductor
as a continuous current when really it is a nanosecond disjoint
current. And the
reason there is no resistance is because the electrons travel near the
speed of
light and not a slow drift speed. So if that is true, then we an setup
three
experimental tables one having a Wimshurst generator which is run at a
nanosecond charges and discharges. Second table is a regular DC
current that
is interrupted in nanoseconds, perhaps stroboscopically and whose
current output is the same as the Wimshurst. And third table is
a superconductor setup. So that of these three tables, all of them
should be
the same current. All three are the same concerning current but only
two of them will have a Meissner Effect and only two of them will be
resistance free.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies