sci.physics.electromag

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> Today I have the Wimshurst generator up and running and did some first
> tests.
>
> I still need the other half of this experiment before I draw any
> conclusions. But I wanted to
> see some preliminary results.
>
> I placed two small magnetic chess pieces on the electrodes of the
> Wimshurst. What I would
> like to see is levitation as a Meissner Effect of the chess pieces
> either at the electrodes or
> at the Leyden Jars. The chess magnets are small enough to give
> levitation if levitation occurs.
> So far there has been no effect or no change.
>
> So far that is a good sign, although a better sign would have been
> outright levitation or
> Meissner Effect.
>

After much thought, my magnets are too strong and the current is not
continuous enough
to provide levitation of the magnet as a Meissner Effect. So I need to
modify the two experiments
so as to measure a Meissner Effect.

Experiment One is the Wimshurst generator as a Capacitor Current which
is a superconduction-current

Experiment Two is a normal-regular photon messenger current in copper
wire with applied DC current.

So what I aim to show is that Lightning bolt is a Superconductor
current since it is a Capacitor Current
and the same for a Wimshurst or Van de Graaff generator currents are
also superconduction currents.

I aim to show that a Leyden Jar Capacitor has a Meissner Effect
because it is a Capacitor.

Superconductivity is simply the current and electricity involved with
a Capacitor.

One could say that Superconductivity equals Capacitor.

Now dielectrics have a major role in superconductivity because they
have a major role in Capacitors.

And the copper oxide layers in perovskites is simply a pretty
dielectric designed capacitor.

Now I tried to levitate the Wimshurst Current and was successful with
my more powerful magnet.
So maybe I ought to redesign my experiment as to not levitating the
magnet but levitating the
current.

As for the normal-regular current in a copper wire there should be no
such effect other than the
penetration of the magnetic field.

So far so good. And if all goes well, I should be able to get numeric
data worthy of journal publication.

This, my friends, is the world's true theory of superconductivity, and
not that phony baloney stuff
of phonons and Cooper electron pairs and BCS. A really good physicists
at the time of the news
of the high temperature superconductors and with the onslaught of Type
II superconductors and seeing
the utter failing of the BCS theory and the widening of the horizons
of what superconductivity encompasses
should have realized, if they were "good physicists" that
superconduction was a broad concept such as
current-theory and not some remote arcane and exotic process of
quantum mechanics. That the scope
of Superconductivity was so broad that it meant the basis or
foundation of superconductivity had to be
as broad as the phenomenon itself. So the only concept that could
match the broadness of the phenomenon
was the concept of "current", and that modern day physicists just did
not have a clear grasp of different types
of current.

I recently bought every Amazon book on superconductivity that was
published in the past 10 years and that
was priced $15 or below. One of them was "The Theory of
Superconductivity in the High-Tc Cuprates" by
P.W. Anderson 1997 priced at $3.40. Now I was wondering why so cheap
and brand new and from Princeton
Univ? Usually books of this sort go for over $100. My guess is that
the entire thesis of Anderson is all
phony baloney in this book and that the publisher quickly realized the
same and so they sell it for cheap. So
why would Archimedes Plutonium spend about $7 to have that book
shipped to him? Well, because I can
easily ignore all the phony baloney theory of Anderson et al and I
just maybe able to glean a tiny bit of
knowledge from Anderson that would make the $7. worthwhile.

--- quoting Anderson page 13 ---
Superconductivity is exhibited by the same structures, and literally
the same electrons, which show
simple magnetic ordering, on what must quite clearly be seen as an
"either-or" basis: either magnetic
and insulating, or superconducting and metallic, with probably a
frozen disordered magnetic phase
intervening over a small intermediate range of electron concentration.
--- end quoting Anderson ---

The overall book by Anderson is junk-theory but it is the small pieces
of facts that makes it worthwhile.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies