sci.physics.electromag

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(snipped)
>
> If the above is true in whole or part then there should be
> similarities or symmetries
> with the Quantum Hall Effect for DC current compared to AC current:
>

An interesting research report that follows in the lines of my above.

--- quoting http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0026-1394/44/1/002
The ac quantum Hall effect as a primary standard of impedance

J Schurr et al 2007 Metrologia 44 15-23 doi:
10.1088/0026-1394/44/1/002

J Schurr, F J Ahlers, G Hein and K Pierz
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany

Abstract. The quantum Hall resistance measured at frequencies in the
kilohertz
range shows frequency- and current-dependent deviations from the
quantized dc
resistance value. This has been attributed to capacitive effects which
are reflected
in the ac longitudinal resistance. Nulling the ac longitudinal
resistance results in a
frequency- and current-independent quantum Hall resistance. This
criterion is in
close analogy to the dc case and shows that the quantum Hall effect
measured
with ac is the same as with dc. This allows application as a primary
standard of
impedance.

--- end quoting ---

So Superconductivity has this pattern:

AC superconduction = DC superconduction + vortices

according to the above Quantum Hall Effect we have this pattern

AC Quantum Hall Effect = DC Quantum Hall Effect + capacitance
longitudinal resistance

So this brings up the interesting question of whether this is true?

Vortices = capacitance longitudinal resistance

I cannot tell from the scant above abstract and since I have no way of
paying for a download
to view the entire report of above. But I would hazard to guess that
the above is true.

That,

Vortices in Superconductivity is the same thing as the Capacitance
longitudinal resistance

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies