sci.physics.electromag

I am in a far better position with the Capacitor theory than ever was
BCS theory at explaining superconductivity.
Why do I say that? Because I have a mechanism for "no resistance" and
thus, only have to elaborate on
common resistance which everyone has some grasp of a concept thereof.
Whereas the BCS people walk
into superconductivity, deluded with thinking they firmly understand
resistance and thus proceed on
making some new and exotica mechanism to explain "no resistance".

You see, I enter superconductivity by saying "no resistance" is due to
the fact that electrons in a
nth orbital when falling back to ground state never lose or gain
energy. So superconductivity
no resistance is merely the orbiting of electrons. And so, the chore
of explaining superconductivity
is merely a review of how a DC current and AC current encounter
resistance.

On the other hand, BCS people enter the picture believing they know
what resistance is and then
have to concoct a mechanism of "no resistance" which they proceed with
a electron Cooper pairing
with phonons thrown in.

So in the Capacitor Current theory of superconduction, I just merely
have to review what is "normal
everyday resistance" in conduction. Why do wires heat up and why do
metals conduct electricity
well and why do nonconductors not conduct. I merely have to review
things of that nature. For I
already have as given how a substance can be "no resistance" as
electrons are only orbiting
atoms.

Now some may refute that idea by saying that if lightning bolts are
Capacitor Currents, then you
mean to say that a electron kilometers in the atmosphere is an
orbiting electron to an atom on
the ground? And that the lightning bolt is a superconduction current
and that many of those
atoms involved have their electrons kilometers from the nuclei of
those atoms? And I would say,
yes. That a LIghtning bolt is a Capacitor Current for which some atoms
on the ground are positive
charged and their electrons in part are in the clouds and these atoms
have their electrons in a
kilometer distance of an orbit. So that many people have a difficult
time with such a notion that
an atom can be a particle that is kilometers in radius.

So that the Lightning bolt is a superconduction current because there
was no resistance of the
electron moving from the cloud down to the ground, becoming a atom
whose radius goes from
kilometers to that of radius 10^-11 meters.

But this picture also indicates to us what the future applications of
the superconductivity will be.
That if Lightning bolt strikes are the upper limit of distance of
Capacitor Currents as a few kilometers
distance, then, superconductivity will be confined to a distance of a
few kilometers distance.

We should ask the question, how much of a distance is Lightning able
to exist? Can we have
a Lightning bolt that goes a 1,000 kilometers? I doubt it.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies