sci.physics.electromag

I find it rather thrilling that the true theory of superconductivity
has a handle on why "no resistance" but
has difficulty in explaining how resistance enters the picture in a DC
and AC current.

The opposite can be said for the BCS theory where it starts out by
believing it has a handle on what
resistance means in electric current flow but then has to concoct some
bizarre mechanism of
electron Cooper pairing in order to try to explain "no resistance".

Capacitor theory easily explains "no resistance" as the idea that the
electrons are in a higher orbital
and thus there is no loss of any energy as the electron comes back
down to ground state. So that a
superconductor is merely the placing of electrons in a "nth orbital"
and then back down to ground
state orbital and never a loss of energy to what we normally think of
as friction or resistance
in macrophysics.

So the Capacitor theory has a quick and easy answer to why there is
"no resistance". But the problem
now comes in the form of how the Capacitor theory explains resistance
in a everyday current such as
DC and AC currents? Why can the electrons in a battery not be
conceived as going from nth orbital
back down to ground state with no loss in energy? Or why cannot a AC
current shipped long distance
over power transmission lines be not considered as a nth orbital
falling back down to ground state?
Why would a DC and AC current encounter resistance or what we think of
as friction, whereas a
superconductor have "no resistance"?

So you can see my problem in explaining that I have the reverse of the
old fake theory of BCS where they
believed they had a total handle on explaining friction and resistance
in electric currents and then went
ahead and built up an elaborate fake theory of electron Cooper pairing
and other assorted nonsense such
as phonons. Whereas Capacitor theory of Superconductivity starts off
with a easy and total explanation of
"No Resistance" but then has a tough time of explaining resistance in
DC and AC currents.

Sorry, I am interrupted at this moment of writing and will have to
continue later tonight with these ideas.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies







> Archimedes Plutonium
> www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies