sci.physics.electromag

I wrote minutes ago:
>
> So my hunches are that the concept of Vortices in superconductivity is
> merely the differences
> between a Capacitor Current versus a DC current. In the DC current
> that Oersted used in 1820
> and what we now use in modern times has a mild effect of swing. And
> also the Type I superconductor
> , in my hunches, has a mild effect of swing. But a Type II
> superconductor, as my hunches go, would
> have a steep rate of swing.
>

Now I may have the above hunch reversed and thus wrong. This often
happens to
scientists is that they land onto a concept or idea or theory and they
have the dynamics
of the idea understood but where they make a simple error of having a
operation in
reverse or a plus where a minus should be.

It maybe, when tested that the DC current and the Type I show the most
violent swing
and that the Type II becomes the mild swing.

Also, I would have to equilibrate the DC current with the Type I, and
this is easily done
in that the same amperage goes through all three.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies