Group: sci.physics.electromag
From: "Autymn D. C."
Date: Saturday, April 05, 2008 4:32 AM
Subject: Re: relationship between electrons and photons

On Mar 29, 11:01=A0am, Benj wrote:
> On Mar 29, 10:02 am, "Autymn D. C." wrote:
>
> > Benj, you are very retarded--and you don't heed my posts. =A0Each fot=F2=
n
> > is omnidirectional. =A0If you can show thas radio waves flow viscidly
> > and independent of their charges, then they'd be longitudinal.
>
> Aut, you are very nuts -- and you don't heed (or read) my posts. If
> each foton is omnidirectional then how is it that a laser beam is
> not? =A0All one needs to do to show radio waves are transverse is to

http://google.com/groups?q=3Dcritical-angula in the [fotonic]
transition's shape is the main wherefore; Fresnel interfaces are the
next.

> demonstrate polarization. =A0I've seen no satisfactory demonstration of
> that to date even though transverse propagation is almost totally
> assumed in this day and age. =A0As I said, a large dipole experiment in

As I wrote in other threads about orbitals, polarisation is direct
proof of discrete orbits such as your circula. Know already its axis
is a pseudovector, hennes the odd "transverse" name.

> space could settle it, but so far nobody has done that. What I
> actually suspect is that electromagnetic radiation actually consists
> of BOTH transverse and longitudinal waves in some ratio. I presume at
> light frequencies the longitudinal component is very minor
> (corresponding perhaps to the leakage in crossed Polaroids) and in VLF
> radio the transverse component would be equally minuscule.

Longitudinal waves with nonzero power would be material--or el=E8ctronic
sound.

-Aut

Safety Articles | News in English | 20lbs in 30 days | Bluegrass | Usenet Newsfeeds