sci.physics.particle

wrote in message
news:45a3ccb0-1cdb-482a-91f8-904393a83967@1g2000hsl.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 30, 11:03 am, "Vres" wrote:
> "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
>
> The previous posting showed ("A Basic Look at the Aether") that the
> classical Aether must exist because it endowed the volume of supposedly
> "empty" space with observable properties. If space were not filled with
> "something" it could not have any properties other than volume since
"space"
> is an abstract mathematical concept, it is not "real". If, however, we add
> the concept of the Aether, the confusion associated with the Relativity
> concepts vanishes.

The issue that most have with the concept is in the Intrinsic Bias we have
because we are located within the Aether and it permeates all matter.
Maxwell, Einstine and others try to understand it as a medium matter
moves through, which is not the case. I contend that matter is connected
via
the Aether and the Aether acts as an inverse tensor as matter moves with it.

The Drag is induced and percieved as the Effect aspect of Gravity. Since
we, and
all devices we build to observe matter are also connected via the Quantum
State (Aether)
we can never actually observe it. We can only modle matter in relitive
motion to other matter.
This is why we must insert nebulas constructs to make sense of what we
observe.

We conceive of multi-dimensions, Paradox's, Infinity, and Constants to make
what we
observe understandable. Reality is there are only 4 dimensions, no
paradox's, no constants
and no such thing as Infinity. Its much , much simpler.

I contend that there is a Smallest Particle of Physicle Matter and many of
the so called
Particles are but waves through the Quantum State which are observed as
particles due
to the intrinsic bias of us being connected to that which we attempt to
observe.

I have written of this postulate since the 80's and one of the perdiction it
made was that
the Universe will expand at an ever increasing rate of expansion, which is
now been
evidenced. This view gives a rational that explains how QM,SR,GR and almost
all
existing physicle laws remain intact while perdicting the velocity of c is a
variable and
that the UGC ( Universal Gravitational Constant) reduces as the Universe
expands,
which of course means its no constant.

This view also explains duality and how there are no such thing as Photons,
Neutrons, Electrons
or any Real Physicle balls of stuff to any particle that displays the
observed aspect of duelity. They are but waves which are effected by the
method of observation as waves hetrodyned from the
observer, object being observed and any devices designed to observe.





>
> Starting with Newtonian physics, let us add the observationally proven
> concept that light propagates through space (i.e.- the Aether) at a
velocity
> determined by the permeability and dielectric constant of space. Light,
and
> all electromagnetic radiation, is a transverse wave and as such cannot
> propagate through a fluid. It was concluded Early on that the Aether must
be
> a solid. If we examine the propagation of light though the cosmos we
observe
> that there is no detectable chromatic dispersion. The lack of such
> dispersion shows that the Aether is either a continuous solid (like jello)
> or granular (like tapioca). To produce the observed lack of chromatic
> dispersion, the maximum possible size of granularity must be extremely
> small even compared to the Planck Length (10^35 meters). In addition, to
> produce the cosmologically observed gravitational and inertial effects,
the
> Aether must be extremely ridged. Since matter can move freely though the
> Aether, matter cannot be a solid, but rather must be composed of standing
> waves, as some current theories have suggested. (If, for example, a quark
or
> an electron consisted of a single cycle of electromagnetic radiation
> refracted into a circular path, a charged particle would be produced which
> could propagate through the solid
Aether -http://einsteinhoax.com/posting44.htm. and be observed as matter.
>
> A basic premise of the Relativity concepts is that the velocity of
> light is the same IN all velocity and elevation reference frames. This
idea
> has falsely been interpreted to means that the velocity of light is the
same
> BETWEEN all reference frames. Once one recognizes the difference, the
> mystery of Relativity vanishes and the subject is easily understood at the
> intuitive level. This basic premise of Relativity is incorrectly stated,
it
> should read that matter controls its properties by measuring the LOCAL
> velocity of light and adjusting them so as to make the LOCALLY observed
> velocity of light as C. There is no requirement that the velocity of light
> be equal to C in other reference frames.
>
> With this in mind, consider that the observer's reference frame is at
> absolute rest (an arbitrary but legitimate choice). In a reference frame
> which is moving with respect to the observer's frame, light has further to
> travel to make a round trip. In the direction parallel to the velocity
> vector, the travel distance is increased by 1/(1-V^2/C^2) and in the
> transverse direction by (1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5. In order for the velocity of
> light to be C, as observed in the moving reference frame, matter must
> contract in the direction of the velocity vector in proportion to
> (1-V^2/C^2)^0.5. and the duration of the ticks of a clock must become
longer
> in proportion to (1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5. (This conclusion was provided by
> Fitzgerald and Larmor two years prior to the publication of Special
> Relativity.) This conclusion makes all of the effects associated with
> Special Relativity intuitively obvious if one is not too lazy to think
them
> true (only algebra is required). It can be shown that when velocity is
> increased, additional energy is added to any energy in the matter. It is
> this storage of energy which we observe as kinetic energy. It is
associated
> with the so-called "fictitious" force of inertia and results from a REAL
> push against the Aether.
>
> There is, in addition, a relativistic effect associated with the
> proximity of energy. The proximity of energy causes the local permeability
> of space to be reduced. This reduction in permeability reduces the
ABSOLUTE
> velocity of light and causes matter to contract. In this contraction,
matter
> sheds energy by releasing the energy of fall and, after the fall contains
a
> mass energy which, in absolute terms, has been reduced by that energy. The
> effect is to cause matter to "push" against the Aether with a force which
is
> currently (and falsely) interpreted as the "fictitious" force of gravity.
>
> All of the relativistic effects (velocity and gravity) can be defined
> by three sets of transformations (transformations for other terms are
found
> by applying Dimensional Analysis to accepted physical laws).
>
> Force = 1
> Length = (1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5)/(1-$)
> Time = ((1-V^2/C^2)^0.5)*(1-$)
>
> Where $ is the gravitational potential between elevations as measured in
> terms of the upper elevation units of measurement. It was very satisfying
to
> find that these transformations lead to predictions of the cosmologically
> observed universe.
>
> The source material for this posting may be found
inhttp://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm(1997);http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm
> (1987); andhttp://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm(1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
> ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
> TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
> MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
> REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP
FROM
> THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
>
> All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at
thehttp://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.
>
> Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
> a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same
courtesy
> as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our
parts,
> please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
> have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
>
> E-mail:- einsteinh...@isp.com. If you wish a reply, be sure that your
> mail reception is not blocked.
>
> The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
> years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
> MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
> individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
> questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
> objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
> Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
> exception for which a correction was provided.

the intrinsic space energy is the cosmos most dynamic area Bert