sci.physics.electromag

In article
<6b753d1f-6344-480c-807a-bc75e7fd31fa@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
"Autymn D. C." wrote:

> On Mar 3, 10:15 am, a_plutonium wrote:
> > I believe the answer is that of asking how can you have electron
> > motion that never has
> > friction or resistance? Electrons orbiting atoms are forever in motion
> > with never any
> > resistance or friction. Now if someone wants more than this, well,
> > there is no more detail
> > or elaboration. There is no common example in life of a perpetual
> > motion machine that is the
> > electron in orbiting around an atom forever without friction or
> > resistance.
>
> You don't read and heed my posts, shitheaded retard.
>
> http://google.com/groups?q=Autymn+persistent
>
> Elèctrostatic levitation-repulsion of hair doesn't work when loft is
> damp and briny, which is when currents [magnetic] are greatest, so you
> Archimedes are as assbackwards and retarded as Androcles in
> relativity. Now shut your brainshitting or these usenetters will help
> me find where you Ludwig are so I can smash your muttey head in.

***{Since Archie is a lesserling, don't forget to eat him after you kill
him. :-) --MJ}***

> Silver's elèctronic mobility is greater than copper's. It's also a
> better reflector-rejector of radio, microwave, and infrared. Its
> better conductivity should be the same wherefore as sodium's,
> calcium's, and aluminium's are better than their overelements'
> conductivity, as well as beryllium's over helium's--nuclear shielding.
>
> http://google.com/groups?q=Autymn+palladium+rhodium
>
> They must find out how these metals behave in a field of ozone or
> monoxygen.
>
> kelvins, not Kelvin, innumerate cretin
>
> -Aut

*****************************************************************
If I seem to be ignoring you, consider the possibility
that you are in my killfile. --MJ