Group: sci.physics.electromag
From: "Chris"
Date: Monday, March 24, 2008 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: #108 vortices maybe the Oersted Experiment deviations; new textbook: "How Superconductivity really works; nanosecond Capacitor discharge current"

Would you do the pith ball charged with negative electricity and see its
deflection from a conductor carrying current as a test of special
relativity?

According to eintien the conduction electrons contract and thus have a
higher negative charge density than the fixed positive charges thus the pith
ball charged with negative electricity will be strongly repelled from the
wire carrying a current.

--
Chris

wrote in message
news:adc4d6ca-7771-4bde-825d-270fc6c5e2a8@a23g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>I wrote minutes ago:
>>
>> So my hunches are that the concept of Vortices in superconductivity is
>> merely the differences
>> between a Capacitor Current versus a DC current. In the DC current
>> that Oersted used in 1820
>> and what we now use in modern times has a mild effect of swing. And
>> also the Type I superconductor
>> , in my hunches, has a mild effect of swing. But a Type II
>> superconductor, as my hunches go, would
>> have a steep rate of swing.
>>
>
> Now I may have the above hunch reversed and thus wrong. This often
> happens to
> scientists is that they land onto a concept or idea or theory and they
> have the dynamics
> of the idea understood but where they make a simple error of having a
> operation in
> reverse or a plus where a minus should be.
>
> It maybe, when tested that the DC current and the Type I show the most
> violent swing
> and that the Type II becomes the mild swing.
>
> Also, I would have to equilibrate the DC current with the Type I, and
> this is easily done
> in that the same amperage goes through all three.
>
> Archimedes Plutonium
> www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies