sci.physics.particle

On Feb 21, 12:30 am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
> On Feb 20, 9:53 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 19, 10:38 pm, "Y.y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > > > 2
> > > > > they could not understand that
> > > > > NO MASS NO REAL PHYSICS !!
>
> > > > > (which should be one of the basics of physics
> > > > > and a more powerful 'lithmus paper' to examine
> > > > > quickly if a theory makes physics sense
> > > > > or jsut a fairy tale ! (spelling for 'tale ' taile ?? )
> > > > > ie nonsens physics
> > > > > anyway
> > > > > years later even Gisse &Co will get it
> > > > > but he wil claime that that is** his** innovation.. (:-)
>
> > > > > ATB
> > > > > Y.Porat
> > > > > ----------------------
>
> > > > What a blithering idiot. You still don't get that E = mc^2 isn't valid
> > > > for moving objects.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > -----------------
> > > imbecil parrot
> > > so what is that c there??
>
> > > have you heared about
> > > INTRINSIC MOVEMENT ??
>
> > > doe s a little fucker like you what toteachme
> > > about the structure of matter and energy
> > > and mass problems ??
> > > just whipe out the milk from your stupid arrogant face
>
> > What are you even trying to say? Your gibberish has improved - nobody
> > knows what the hell you are talking about.
>
> > > ATB
> > > Y.Porat- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> ----------------
> of course you cant understand
> you cant understand anything that is not in your textbook
>
> (what has all that got to do with my English crooky??)

It means that more often than not I actually have no idea what you are
really trying to say because you fuck up your English so badly that a
native speaker can't parse your output.

>
> and your parrot teachers
> (may be the white bears of Alaska ??)
> what might be intrinsic movement
> inside the Atom that gives it its internal energy
> 2
> tell your bears of Alaska that
> ENERGY IS MASS IN MOVEMENT
> no matter how you turn it around
> 3
> satrt understanding physics before mathematics
> got it little 24 years parrot??
>
> (generally young people are less parrots then you are
> they have an open criticising mind)
>
> Y.Porat
> --------------------------------