sci.physics.particle

On Feb 19, 10:38 pm, "Y.y.Porat" wrote:
> On Feb 20, 7:20 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 19, 1:08 am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 18, 4:34 pm, pmb wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 18, 3:12 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
> > > > > On Feb 17, 10:42 pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > > [...]
>
> > > > > Why is it so difficult for you to understand that E=mc^2 is a limiting
> > > > > case?
>
> > > > Dear Eric
>
> > > > I don't understand this comment. What do you mean when you say that
> > > > "E=mc^2 is a limiting case?" Thank you.
>
> > > > Pete
>
> > > ---------------
> > > eric is unable to do some reading between the lines:
>
> > > it is not only an abstract limit case!
> > > it has some other conclusions :
>
> > > if E=mc^2 for the photon
> > > it means that the photon CAN move at c !
> > > and a firther conclusion:
>
> > > the photon is an exception cace to the rule that
> > > no mass can reach c
> > > (the mass of the photon can reach c as an exception case)
>
> > > and even an additional insight :
> > > THERE IS JUST ONE KIND OF MASS!
> > > no matter how youcall it
> > > just one kind of mass
>
> > > all the 'other masses' were an invension of
> > > amthematiciance who didt undersand the masic of physics
> > > and could not grasp tha teach physics formula of eqaution
> > > has its limits of validatio
> > > and they could not immagine that the rule
> > > of
> > > no mass canreach c doe snot include the mass
> > > of the photon
> > > 2
> > > they could not understand that
> > > NO MASS NO REAL PHYSICS !!
>
> > > (which should be one of the basics of physics
> > > and a more powerful 'lithmus paper' to examine
> > > quickly if a theory makes physics sense
> > > or jsut a fairy tale ! (spelling for 'tale ' taile ?? )
> > > ie nonsens physics
> > > anyway
> > > years later even Gisse &Co will get it
> > > but he wil claime that that is** his** innovation.. (:-)
>
> > > ATB
> > > Y.Porat
> > > ----------------------
>
> > What a blithering idiot. You still don't get that E = mc^2 isn't valid
> > for moving objects.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> -----------------
> imbecil parrot
> so what is that c there??
>
> have you heared about
> INTRINSIC MOVEMENT ??
>
> doe s a little fucker like you what toteachme
> about the structure of matter and energy
> and mass problems ??
> just whipe out the milk from your stupid arrogant face

What are you even trying to say? Your gibberish has improved - nobody
knows what the hell you are talking about.

>
> ATB
> Y.Porat