sci.physics.particle

On Mar 2, 11:53=A0am, Eric Gisse wrote:
> On Mar 1, 9:59 pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 1, 2:30 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 29, 11:48 am, Michael Helland wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 29, 12:30 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
> > > > > On Feb 29, 11:10 am, Michael Helland wrote:
> > > > > > Have you ever once in your life come up with a hypothesis that n=
o one
> > > > > > else has?
>
> > > > > Yes.
>
> > > > For example?
>
> > > You don't know enough about anything to make it worth my time.
>
> > -----------
> > fucken lier
> > you never innovated anything(in your 24 poor years ..
> > except being a little =A0psyco =A0Napoleon Bonaparte)
> > **and never will do it*
> > you are not built for it
> > you are a born =A0 cureless =A0parrot
> > unless you will steal sometning . from soemone else ....
> > and for that you are rather well built ...)
>
> > and dont make a mistake
> > people learn quite quick to identify
> > (and smell )people like you
> > Y.P
> > ---------------
>
> You are an angry little man. Consider therapy.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-----------------
angree - yes
and i have good reasons to be
(but not all along the day (:-)

therapy??
than you
i have my 'normality certificats' over more than 50 years of
productive tangible activity

in concrete and steel and family raising etc etc
and mind you
even in advancing physics
at least by starting to roll some corroded wheels
in the minds of people who call themselves scientists
how about you ??
how about some productive tangible achievements ??

keep well
Y.Porat
----------------------