sci.physics.particle

On Feb 26, 9:12 pm, Igor wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2:32 am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 25, 8:24 pm, Igor wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 23, 11:46 pm, Jeff$B"%(BRelf wrote:
>
> > > > Why " Igor " ( instead of Tom Hoovler ) ?
>
> > > It's a long crazy story, but it relates to this campy '60s movie:
>
> > >http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0059124/
>
> > ----------------------
> > i asked
> > who is nominating the sci.research moderators
>
> > so now i understand that ................
> > they are nominating THEMSELVES !!! (:-)
>
> > and do not let ousiders to get it
>
> > so now we canunderstand the real worth of that ng !!
> > as an advancing tool for physics
> > (a chorus of parrots of the ' church '....)
> > so let everyone know the real facts
> > Y.P
> > ---------------------
>
> Since you'll never be mistaken for a person who understands any real
> physics, I probably wouldn't worry too much about it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

---------------
you dont worry about anything !!(except your pomous ego)
and that is why you will never be
a pioneer physicist...]
(unless you will parctice your good plagiatory skills .. (:-)

keep well
Y.Porat