sci.physics.particle

On Mar 30, 11:49 am, NoEinstein wrote:
> On Mar 29, 4:43 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 29, 12:36 am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 29, 1:25 am, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > On Mar 28, 8:19 am, Jeff$B"%(BRelf wrote:
>
> > > > > Imagine a hug blast of gamma-ray photons from a supernova
> > > > > imparting it's momentum ( p=e/c ) on your ass, blowing you away,
> > > > > increasing your inertial mass..
>
> > > > > Where was this inertial mass one second before it hit your butt ?
> > > > > was it in the supernova ? or in the photons ?
> > > > > Why do you think this is related to the rest mass of the photons ?
>
> > > > Dear Jeff: "Mass" is just a gob of energy that is capable of being
> > > > attracted to other energy. Gamma rays could be either a large gob of
> > > > energy traveling at, say, 'c', or it could be a smaller gob of energy
> > > > traveling much faster than 'c'. Both have destructive effects because
> > > > of the ether that clumps in front of the gamma ray, as it travels.
> > > > Since ether is polar, portions of the gamma ray will allow ether to
> > > > ride along, and that is what causes it to be so destructive.
> > > > But the mass of a gamma ray is pretty moot, because it is its
> > > > energy which causes the destruction, not its mass. -- NoEinstein --
>
> > > -----------------
> > > energy is
> > > MASS IN MOTION !!
>
> > > idiots
> > > E=mc^2 idiots (see the m there idiots )
> > > th e mass i s even in hf hiding in the h
> > > (got it blockheads ??)
>
> > > PHOTONS HAS MASS
>
> > How do you know when no experiment in the past century has confirmed
> > massive photons?
>
> > > abd there is jsut one kind of mass
> > > no matter how do you cal it
> > > and old Catto saied
> > > no mass no real physics !!
> > > got it idiots ??
> > > you are waisting our precious time with your stupidity
>
> > > Y.Porat
> > > ----------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Dear Folks: Photons don't have mass, because they can't be
> gravitationally attracted.

And you think that only things with mass can be gravitationally
attracted? What on earth makes you think that? Do you think that
because cows have four legs that all mammals have four legs, too?

> But photons can be deflected by ether
> flow, or by passing through ether of varying density, as near all
> massive objects, like the Sun. -- NoEinstein --

Evidence for ether, NoEinstein?