sci.physics.particle

On Mar 29, 12:36 am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
> On Mar 29, 1:25 am, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 28, 8:19 am, Jeff$B"%(BRelf wrote:
>
> > > Imagine a hug blast of gamma-ray photons from a supernova
> > > imparting it's momentum ( p=e/c ) on your ass, blowing you away,
> > > increasing your inertial mass..
>
> > > Where was this inertial mass one second before it hit your butt ?
> > > was it in the supernova ? or in the photons ?
> > > Why do you think this is related to the rest mass of the photons ?
>
> > Dear Jeff: "Mass" is just a gob of energy that is capable of being
> > attracted to other energy. Gamma rays could be either a large gob of
> > energy traveling at, say, 'c', or it could be a smaller gob of energy
> > traveling much faster than 'c'. Both have destructive effects because
> > of the ether that clumps in front of the gamma ray, as it travels.
> > Since ether is polar, portions of the gamma ray will allow ether to
> > ride along, and that is what causes it to be so destructive.
> > But the mass of a gamma ray is pretty moot, because it is its
> > energy which causes the destruction, not its mass. -- NoEinstein --
>
> -----------------
> energy is
> MASS IN MOTION !!
>
> idiots
> E=mc^2 idiots (see the m there idiots )
> th e mass i s even in hf hiding in the h
> (got it blockheads ??)
>
> PHOTONS HAS MASS

How do you know when no experiment in the past century has confirmed
massive photons?

> abd there is jsut one kind of mass
> no matter how do you cal it
> and old Catto saied
> no mass no real physics !!
> got it idiots ??
> you are waisting our precious time with your stupidity
>
> Y.Porat
> ----------------------