sci.physics.particle

On Mar 31, 3:58=A0am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
> On Mar 31, 8:33=A0am, festusby...@btinternet.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 31 Mar, 06:12, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 30, 8:44=A0pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > On Mar 31, 1:39=A0am, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
> > > > > On Mar 30, 7:42=A0am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > > > Following the current discussion about starting the LHC
>
> > > > > > a few questions should (IMHO) be examined:
>
> > > > > > 1
> > > > > > is there a minimal critical mass of a black hole
> > > > > > in order that it will survive continuously ??
>
> > > > > > 2
> > > > > > considering the H bomb explotion =A0 and knowledge-
> > > > > > and experience --
> > > > > > are 'black holes of some magnitude
> > > > > > created there ??
>
> > > > > Questions like this automatically exclude you from the non-debate.=

>
> > > > > > TIA
> > > > > > Y.Porat
> > > > > > --------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > ------------------
> > > > please by pass the
> > > > -little psychopath
>
> > > > Y.P
> > > > ------------------
>
> > > Says the guy who seriously asked if H bombs make black holes.- Hide qu=
oted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Well!!!, considering black holes are found only in the heart of a
> > galaxy. Well will need at least 500 million fusion stars like our sun.
> > But we cannot even produce on working stable fusion reactor yet.
> > Ahahahaha!
>
> > Soooooo! anyhooo! We do have a long way to go before we can generate
> > the amount of energy a black hole requires.
>
> > We should really be worried about our carbon foot print and the polar
> > ice melting.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> ----------------
> you are right about global worming
> now abouth the LHC
>
> there must beno doubt abot it
> so it is worth to think before opperating it
> while we say black hole from LHC
> we do not mean =A0 of couirse a big one
> my question is
> is there a chance for even a microscopic back hle to be created ??

Not much. But even in the event that it is, microscopic black holes
evaporate. Very quickly.

>
> it is imporant both theoretically and practically
> if it will be a tiny balck hole =A0(BH) that will disapear
> imediately =A0than it is not relvant practically
> but may be theoretically
>
> and let me tell you my oppinion and understanding :
> BH is actually a =A0 bundle of protons that lost their electrons

No, that's not right.
Try reading Kip Thorne's book, "Black Holes and Time Warps".

> and collaps to a closer distance between them
> so mind you
> it happence and abundant much more than you immagine
> each fusion is a tiny black hole event !!
>
> only that not =A0 big enough and lacking* the complete** set of
> properties **to satrt to be the famous monster
>
> so we have to be careful while doing something
> that is unprecedented big !!
>
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> ---------------------