Group: sci.physics.particle
From: festusbyrne@btinternet.com
Date: Monday, March 31, 2008 12:33 AM
Subject: Re: The current discussed risk of LHC

On 31 Mar, 06:12, Eric Gisse wrote:
> On Mar 30, 8:44=A0pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 31, 1:39=A0am, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 30, 7:42=A0am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > Following the current discussion about starting the LHC
>
> > > > a few questions should (IMHO) be examined:
>
> > > > 1
> > > > is there a minimal critical mass of a black hole
> > > > in order that it will survive continuously ??
>
> > > > 2
> > > > considering the H bomb explotion =A0 and knowledge-
> > > > and experience --
> > > > are 'black holes of some magnitude
> > > > created there ??
>
> > > Questions like this automatically exclude you from the non-debate.
>
> > > > TIA
> > > > Y.Porat
> > > > --------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > ------------------
> > please by pass the
> > -little psychopath
>
> > Y.P
> > ------------------
>
> Says the guy who seriously asked if H bombs make black holes.- Hide quoted=
text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well!!!, considering black holes are found only in the heart of a
galaxy. Well will need at least 500 million fusion stars like our sun.
But we cannot even produce on working stable fusion reactor yet.
Ahahahaha!

Soooooo! anyhooo! We do have a long way to go before we can generate
the amount of energy a black hole requires.

We should really be worried about our carbon foot print and the polar
ice melting.