sci.physics.particle

On Apr 11, 10:54=A0pm, frankli...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Actually, the reason why I ask you about this point is that you don't
> have to believe my premise that everything is made out of positrons
> and electrons. If the question is "where did the antimatter go", then
> the answer is simply that if you look at what happens when you collide
> electrons and positrons (fundamental matter and antimatter) together
> in accelerator experiments, the only thing that survives are protons
> and electrons which then go onto to form all visible mass. Now we
> don't know why it is that the protons survive rather than the anti-
> protons in the decays, but it seems clear from experiment and the

When we start with matter, we stop with matter--duh. Antimatter must
come from the matter's energies. The world is not ambiplasma.

> By the way, just what is the obvious case that you think it is not
> true that everything unstable eventually decays into positrons/
> electrons or energy events like photons or neutrinos?

Neutrinos carry away a star's mass; fot=F2ns do not as they aren't
matter. The latter dwells in the same field's spot.