sci.physics.electromag

On 17 mar, 14:54, nade wrote:
> On Mar 17, 9:12 pm, "Juan R." Gonz=E1lez-=C1lvarez
>
> wrote:
> > nade wrote on Mon, 17 Mar 2008 05:21:46 -0700:
>
> > > What do you think of the following paper written by this esteemed
> > > physicist?
>
> > >http://www.stardrive.org/Jack/PhippsEM.pdf
>
> > > nad
>
> > I did explicit my opinion about Phipps Hertzian approach in a previous
> > post.
>
> > --http://canonicalscience.org/en/miscellaneouszone/guidelines.txt
>
> Say, are you a normal or a crackpot? How come you have 13 stars with
> one rating. Did the crackpots rate you or did the normal?
>
> About Phipps.. do you think he is loose screw?

You must stop to use the word "crackpot"

crackpot ?

If Newton wrote here, it is exactly the insult which you would use
against him!!!
How I know it? Which evidence?
It is very simple:
I am a newtonist, in favour of Newton and I defend absolute space, and
the absolute velocities against the relativistic imbeciles!
And I receive spittles, the insults, calumnies (and even the threats:
Jacques Lavau) of the partisans of Einstein, same spittles, same
insults, same calumnies and same threats that would receive Isaac
Newton.

Si Newton =E9crivait ici, c'est exactement l'insulte que vous
utiliseriez contre lui !!!
Comment je le sais ? Quelles preuves ?
C'est tr=E8s simple :
Je suis un newtoniste, partisan de Newton et je d=E9fends l'espace
absolu, et les vitesses absolues contre les imb=E9ciles relativistes !
Et je re=E7ois les crachats, les insultes, les calomnies (et m=EAme les
menaces : Jacques Lavau) des partisans de Einstein, les m=EAmes
crachats, les m=EAmes insultes, les m=EAmes calomnies et les m=EAmes menaces=

que recevrait Isaac Newton.