sci.physics.electromag

On Mar 19, 2:25=A0am, PD wrote:
> 3. Being able to string jargon together is not an indicator of whether
> one is a physicist, let alone a brilliant one. You have been duped by
> one of these posters, who is a shuckster, a liar, and who is
> perpetually on a short track to Wrong. Now, tell me, what do you have
> at your disposal to tell which one of them is the scam?

How do some longtime posters such as yourself keep from Androcles's
block?

All the while they don't get to tell him his setup has two
independents, which by definition can't make his equality--as every
one of his bickers is his innumerate invention and not relativity's or
Einstein's. He's not a "shuckster"; he's a shyster.

http://dictionary.com/browse/shyster

-Aut