sci.physics.electromag

On Mar 20, 4:54=A0am, "Androcles" wrote:
> "hanson" wrote in message
>
> news:1kbEj.16619$Id3.2721@trnddc07...
> | ..... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... AHAHAHAHA....| "Androcles" ogwarts.physics> wrote in message
>
> |news:sc7Ej.34320$M9.5545@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> | great stuff,... profound and incisive, as usual, but beyond the
> | comprehension of any of parroting Einstein Dingleberries
> | who tried to make their case for Einstein's crock... ahahahaha...
> | >
> | Hey Andro, you sure do know how to flush out those virulent
> | Einstein Dingleberries... like fade "nade" > | Dunce PD-Draper, Hairy "harry" , Karandarse
> | Dunno Dono, Toilet Dweller Wabnig, Saucepan Szczepan Bia=B3ek"
> | , Variouos Kike Varneys and a host of others...
> | But sadly, all your heroic efforts only make those poor bastards
> | move closer to the warmth of Einstein's sphincter..... ahahaha...
> | >
> | Actually, do have some pity for them. Those brainwashed poor
> | dumbfucks, all being damaged goods now, do not realize that
> | they have fallen victim to the greatest intellectual con of the 20th
> | century.... DESPITE the fact that Einstein HIMSELF told them so
> | with/in his many admonishments, ever since 1920....:
>
> Me? Have pity? You misunderstand me, sir, pity would be an emotion.
> I reserve emotion for those that matter, not for dingbats.
> In matters of science I appear as this, blindfold:
> =A0http://www.spectator.co.nz/images/justice.gif
>
> Why should anyone be interested in a clown that says:
> "After analyzing it. Well. This is what I can comment. Imagine yourself
> being in the moving orange horizontal, you can see the light moving
> at c.
> While for those at another frame of reference (in out seats
> looking at the monitor for instance), it may seem longer."
>
> "In out seats"? "it (c) may seem longer"?

What I simply meant is that in our seats looking at a moving
frame of reference (represented by the monitor image). It takes
longer time for c to go from A to B. This translate to time slowing
down. For example, we see the c of the moving block travels
for 12 seconds in our frame while in its frame the time is 4
seconds. This means for every 4 seconds in its frame, it
takes 12 seconds in our frame. But since the speed of light
is constant and both the frames must see the same speed
of light. Time dilation occurs in moving frame with respect
to ours. Note that c =3D distance travel/time. Let the horizonal
numbers in your demo animation signify the distance.
Since the distance for the point to move from A to B is
12 and the time is also 12 in the clock. C=3D1 which is
unity. In the return from B to A which signifies closer
to light speed in its frame.. 4/4=3D1. Again, since c is
always c and we see longer path of c in the moving
frame which takes shorter for the observer in that frame.
Everything else in the moving ship slows down with
respect to us, and you can see slow motion in other image.
This is why moving frame of reference such as atomic clock
in fast orbit around the planet has slower time.

This all occurs because c is the common timing reference
used by reality computer program as bookkeeping to make
sure the equations have symmetric state in all locations
in the virtual state called spacetime. Get the hang of it
dude. Relativity will fail in a pure physical world.. but it
so happens we don't actually live in one.



nade



>
> And that is after anal-yzing it well.
> I can't have pity for a lunatic, it wouldn't do any good anyway.
>
> | >
> | ::AE:: .... "NOT search at the same, now well lit places, where he,
> | Einstein, had been working".
> | >
> | --- =A0More here about Einstein's Anus Mirabilis
> | =A0 =A0 =A0 (=3D Albert's sphincter where his EDs do worship):
> |
> | The nature and character traits of EDs:
> |
> | >
> | Einstein's conscience finally caught up with him, when he was
> | fessing up about the con of REL, ... one year before he folded
> | his tent, closed his umbrella, kicked the bucket, bit the grass
> | and puffed, ... when/where he said to Besso in 1954:
> | ::AE:: "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based
> | ::AE:: on the field concept, i. e., on continuous structures. In that
> | ::AE:: case nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation
> | ::AE:: theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics." . =A0[ &
> | ::AE::elsewhere] "why would anyone be interested in getting
> | ::AE:: exact solutions of such an ephemeral set of equations?"
> | >
> | Other Luminaries have followed suit agreeing with Albert's
> | final realizations, insights and assessments, saying:
> | >
> | ::: Professor Carver A. Mead of Caltech (a student of Feynman),
> | ::: who said
> | ::: "It is my firm belief that the last seven decades of the 20th centur=
y
> | ::: will be characterized in history as the dark ages of physics."
> | >
> | ::: or F.A Hayek, Nobel laureate, who said: "In the future,
> | ::: Humanity will see in our Epoch an Era of superstition, essentially
> | ::: associated with the names of Marx, =A0Freud and Einstein"
> | >
> | ::: or John Beckman, an astronomy professor and Einstein disciple:
> | ::: "The theory of relativity lives on. =A0 Is it a true picture of real=
ity?
> | ::: That is probably more a matter of faith than of proof."
> | >
> | So, like in any movement and/or religion there are fanatic disciples
> | of which you have garnered a set here:.. the financially and mentally
> | poverty stricken Einstein Dingleberries... for whose, "here-and-now
> | earthly Seelen-heil" it should be pointed out that in the real world,
> | today,
> | >
> | =3D=3D mil/indust. Eng, R&D....................."does not need REL shit"=

> | =3D=3D *.edu =A0and grantology ..................."does need REL - No sh=
it"
> | =3D=3D Promo, Sales & Movies..............."loves REL by the shitload"
> | =3D=3D Jews protect it as cultural heritage whether "REL is shit or not"=
.
> | >
> | But thanks for the laughs, guys... ahahaha... ahahanson
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |