sci.physics.electromag

"nade"
>
>Hi, uhm... if special relativity is wrong.

It seems that the assumptions are incorrect. Everywhere we can read that in
1925 Michelson and Gale " did indeed detect the rotation of the earth". For
me at noon and at midnight the MM and MG experiments measure without any
doubts the same. The MG result is not zero. The same is the MM. The SR is
for the case when MM gives zero. Since 1925 we know that MM must have the
same result like MG. So the SR is only a math toy or a piece to teach. It is
not wrong. It is right for the assumptions.
The only interpretation of the resuts of MM and MG is the Michelson
interpretation that aether is not solid elastic body ( how wants the lovers
of Absolute reference frame).

>It means General Relativity is wrong too? If you believe they are both
>wrong. What do you
>think is the cause of gravity?

Here is place for many theories. But at first must be made an agreement on
the both Michelson experiments.
S*