sci.physics.particle

On Mar 30, 1:22=A0am, frankli...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Mar 26, 6:55=A0am, PD wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 26, 1:15=A0am, frankli...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 25, 1:57=A0pm, PD wrote:
>
> > > > On Mar 25, 3:39=A0pm, frankli...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > > > > On Mar 25, 1:06=A0pm, PD wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Mar 22, 10:21=A0pm, frankli...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > > > > > > There is a serious problem in cosmology in that equal amounts =
of
> > > > > > > matter and antimatter should have created, but we generally on=
ly see
> > > > > > > matter, so what happened to all the antimatter?
>
> > > > > > > The solution may be that the antimatter is already bound into =
what we
> > > > > > > call "normal manner". In this view all normal matter particles=
such as
> > > > > > > neutrons and protons are actually combinations of equal amount=
s of
> > > > > > > matter and antimatter.
>
> > > > > > > How is this possible, you may ask? The most fundamental partic=
le of
> > > > > > > antimatter that we recognize is the positron which is the anti=
matter
> > > > > > > partner of the electron. It is the same as the electron except=
it has
> > > > > > > a positive charge. Now hold onto your hats, but I would sugges=
t that
> > > > > > > every positive charge you observe in the universe is due to an=

> > > > > > > antimatter positron. In this view a proton could be a combinat=
ion of 2
> > > > > > > positrons and an electron. A neutron could be a combination of=

> > > > > > > positron and electron.
>
> > > > > > This would immediately demand accounting for selection rules in
> > > > > > observed reactions that seem to obey baryon number conservation =
and
> > > > > > lepton number conservation, which your model would immediately b=
reak.
> > > > > > Since the selection rules are apparently obeyed, and your model =
says
> > > > > > there is no earthly reason for those selection rules, we have a
> > > > > > spectacular experimental problem. Normally, when something happe=
ns
> > > > > > that a model says should NOT happen, or when a model allows some=
thing
> > > > > > to happen and it NEVER happens, this spells trouble for the mode=
l.
>
> > > > > Could you explain a conservation selection rule that my model woul=
d
> > > > > immediately break?
>
> > > > I already told you two examples: baryon number conservation and lept=
on
> > > > number conservation. If you don't know what those selection rules ar=
e,
> > > > then proceed immediately to the library and pick up a copy of Don
> > > > Perkins' book. This is manifest in many, many reactions.
>
> > > > You also need to account for the positive, neutral, and in fact
> > > > negative baryons with your model.
>
> > > > In particular, I'd be interested in you explaining why the decay rat=
e
> > > > and the decay products of the neutral lambda baryon are different th=
an
> > > > the neutral neutron.
>
> > > I am glad you asked. I did research into your question and this is
> > > what I think is going on with lambda decay.
>
> > > Based on these referenceshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda_particleh=
ttp://en.wikipedia.org/w...
>
> > > Decay sequence is:
>
> > > Lambda ->
>
> > > Decay to Pion- and Proton
>
> > > Pion - decay to Muon and neutrino
>
> > > Muon decay to electron and 2 neutrino
>
> > > The Pion basically decays into an electron and 3 neutrinos.
>
> I'm surprised that you didn't comment on my explanation of beta decay
> which eliminates the need for the W particle and the weak force
> entirely. I believe the best way to unify the forces it to remove as
> many fictitious forces as possible. Both the strong and weak forces
> are unncessary in my model. This leaves only the magnetic,
> electrostatic and gravity forces. Magnetic forces are electrostatic in
> nature (not just related, but a direct consequence and made out of an
> alignment of electrostatic fields in the aether) and I am still trying
> to fit gravity under the electrostatic force.
>

It might also interest you to know that W and Z bosons have been
*seen* in the laboratory, leaving exactly the same kind of trail that
J/psi's and pi-zeros and other short-lived particles leave.

You have QUITE a bit of catching up to do with the experimental
literature.

Would you like a reading reference on experimental particle physics?

PD