sci.energy.hydrogen

On Feb 29, 7:14 pm, Bill Penrose wrote:

> I'm asking, not telling.
>
> Even so, I know about embrittlement, but so what? There are generally
> technological solutions to technological problems. Betcha there's at
> least one material in the world that would stand up to hydrogen.

Oh sure: Pure GOLD! Yeah, that's it. That's the "technology" we need
to "save the world"!
Hint: one word: QUANTITY! Things have QUANTITY associated with them!
If you start the "if only one life is saved" bull without considering
the 50 million killed by your scheme then you are only a blind fool.
Simply waving your hands fast and a lot while screaming "technology
will solve it" in reality solves absolutely nothing. In fact, it's
WORSE than nothing, because like all the other fools out there of your
ilk your noise is distracting people with REAL solutions from working
on them and wasting the money that COULD have been used to create
VIABLE technology by funneling it instead into pie in the shy
hopelessly ignorant and hopelessly optimistic dreams that have no
basis in reality. Maybe all you need to power you car is to hang a
certain crystal around your neck when you drive! Never heard about
that one? Don't worry. "Technology" keeps developing new knowledge and
I think with enough government spending on crystal "research" science
can find the exact crystal one day that does the job!

Moron.