sci.energy.hydrogen

In article <47FFB3C1.DD530F19@sonic.net>, Mark Thorson wrote:
>Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 29, 11:09 am, Bill Penrose wrote:
>> > On Feb 29, 11:02 am, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)"
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > WIki has the losses near 7%. Not an enormous
> fraction.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_transmission#Losses
>> >
>> > And the break-even distance is 7000 km.
>> >
>> > Okay, I'm a nuclear advocate again(1). Always was, but we do have to
>> > do something about powering transportation, too.
>> Nuclear-powered cars.
>
>It's called "nuclear hydrogen". It's just like
>regular hydrogen, but it's made at a nuclear reactor.
>
>http://www.energy.gov/news/3480.htm


Can't be good. Your car will probably glow in the dark, and you'll die after
2 minutes in the driver's seat.