sci.energy.hydrogen

On Apr 5, 11:22=A0am, "daestrom"
wrote:
> But ID's biggest 'evidence' is the irrational assertions of some folks
> saying, "Something so complex just couldn't have come about randomly." =A0=
They
> ignore that slighly less complex structures *are* found in nature,
> supporting the idea that the final structure is just a minor mutation from=

> an earlier structure. =A0They do some mathematical trickery trying to show=
the
> chance of some random pieces coming together from zero to a fully function=
al
> structure would take more random tries than time in the universe. =A0But s=
uch
> trickery ignores the natural selection of simpler structures that can evol=
ve
> much more quickly.

Heck, the more we learn about the universe, the more we see that self-
assembly and complexity arising out of simplicity spontaneously are
all over the place. For that matter, look at New York City. Very
complex. Who designed and created it? Or is the most accurate answer
that it created itself?