sci.physics.particle

On Mar 23, 7:35=A0am, brookus wrote:
> On Mar 23, 1:31=A0pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
well explained...
> > =A0 =A0And... it is fun reading.... work a few problems... it's one of t=
he
> > =A0 =A0best things you will ever do.
>
> Thankyou. Good advice! If I get up to speed in terms of theoratical
> knowledge I could argue in a meaningful way that, I think gravity,
> magnetism, inertia are each forces...but, you are right..'potential
> energy may not be a force in itself...could it be transferred through
> an absorbent material [eg. magnetic flux into mass] so as to produce a
> force. I would also argue, after aquiring theoretical knowledge, that
> the universe and, gravity itself, may be an energy only that is now a
> force as we speak. And, I would love to get into the topic further
> but, I do not have theoretical knowledge...it is true. I just look
> around and have noticed what I think to be occuring. That is...a sub-
> materialistic particle may only be energy...it may only be a
> 'quark'...It is beyond me though...However, I tend to think now and,
> may stand to corrected, that magnetism is and energy that is
> transferred within the space around us, into a force.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-----------------
first thing to know is that
1 energy is conserved

2
energy (including potential !! though not all people realized it) is
MASS IN MOVEMENT !

3
energy can be transferred from one system to another one
**only by some collision* of masses
so as long as there is not any collision
you cant transfer energy from one environment
to another
i guess that what was in your mind was
'to your or our **useful uses** " (:-)
4
that is how i personally see it

ATB
Y.Porat
----------------------