sci.physics.electromag

----------------------------
"terrylhewettsr" wrote in message
news:fs24gj$b7i$1@news.netins.net...
>
> "Don Kelly" wrote in message
> news:vh%Ej.105405$pM4.45395@pd7urf1no...
>> ----------------------------
>> "terrylhewettsr" wrote in message
>> news:fs1g0p$uja$1@news.netins.net...
>>> Invention is the marriage of mechanics and the sciences With
>>> innovations in both fields.
>>>
>>> I am an inventor of highly innovative technology. The technology is
>>> basic at best.
>>> however the byproducts are many. Everything is relative through spin.
>>> Fluid dynamics
>>> implicates that every atom of it is spinning. Some extremely slow such
>>> as a solid. the
>>> specific gravity and kinetic energy are fully conserved. It's seemingly
>>> at rest.
>>>
>>> Inventing is mostly problem solving. How great your invention? is
>>> directly related to how
>>> great the problem you set out to solve. Induction one of Faraday's
>>> brain child's. The act
>>> of putting a changing magnetic flux field through an induction coil.
>>> The problem is how
>>> to do that cyclic. The answer is a multipole toroid armature. Super
>>> conductance via a
>>> magnetic bearing in an ideal configuration. Caging the toroid armatures
>>> permanent field
>>> arrangement. Path of least resistance predicts the toroid armature will
>>> spin. This is a
>>> frictionless environment with the potential for high efficiency.
>>>
>>> The whole goal here was to drive a changing magnetic flux field through
>>> an induction coil
>>> cyclic. It turned out driving multiple changing magnetic flux fields
>>> through several
>>> induction coils cyclic. In essence it is free energy. However the
>>> byproducts of spinning
>>> a mass particularly a ring at hyper extreme rates has the potential to
>>> include
>>> antigravity as a byproduct. Unity is defined as the radius of a
>>> natural sine. Given the
>>> previous the form toroid is unity by form alone. to spin the form
>>> toroid is simply over
>>> unity. The transformations of energy in the SRTT are unified
>>> transforming electric to
>>> kinetic and back to electric cyclic for infinity.
>>>
>>> This mechanism is fully multifarious via design variations.
>>>
>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!ringdrawingincomplete.jpg
>>>
>>> There are two kinds of coils 4 each. drive coils and induction coils.
>>> No pulsing
>>> necessary it is centipedal drive system the drive coils magnetically
>>> cage the permanent
>>> fields of the toroid armature. Electromotive forces as defined by
>>> faraday motivates the
>>> toroid armature seeking the path of least resistance in an eccentric
>>> manner orbital about
>>> the axis. Induction coils inducing elec energy via driving multiple
>>> magnetic flux fields
>>> through 4 induction coils at potentially extreme rates of change. In
>>> comparison it would
>>> be like shaking a faraday flashlight 8,000,000 times a minute.
>>>
>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!ringofmagnetswithspacers.jpg
>>>
>>> The Armature once in motion is pure kinetic energy with all the
>>> byproducts associated
>>> with spinning mass.
>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!pt6r002.jpg Note the
>>> physical magnets placements in comparison to the actual fields
>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!centipedalfieldring.jpg OK
>>> the spacing of the
>>> attracting N and S poles has created a extra flux field. It is there in
>>> a physical sense
>>> yet it is pseudo in the sense that it's strong and weak forces can be
>>> easily manipulated.
>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/CentipedalDrive.jpg the
>>> following image is how
>>> the fields may look as the armature is caged by the drive coils.
>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/fluxlines4.jpg please forgive
>>> the crude
>>> drawings as i don't have a source for computer modeled works. The
>>> prototype is #6 and
>>> will never be completed as a testable model. This mechanism is designed
>>> as a one piece
>>> toroid armature consisting of a ceramic or comparable material that can
>>> be host to a
>>> permanent field that is non conductive.
>>>
>>> These drawings are linear this one is the coils and spacing example,
>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!pt6spoolcoilplacementsm.jpg
>>> this one is a
>>> double slice showing the ring chamber and the molded gear section for
>>> twisting the
>>> chamber/spool for winding coils around the armature,
>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!pt6spooldblslicesm.jpg
>>>
>>> Anyways if you could direct this transmittal document to those that may
>>> have an interest
>>> in it for peer review or potential research for any specific
>>> implementation. this is
>>> unique highly innovative technology. You and your associates are
>>> presented with a unique
>>> opportunity.
>>
>>>
>>> terry
>>>
>> ---------------------
>> The explanation is utter rubbish (e.g. what the hell is the radius of a
>> natural sine) and the "presentation of a unique opportunity" is the
>> kicker- both are saying beware the scam.
>>
>> But supposing, as you apparently are doing, superconductivity and no
>> friction it appears to be a no loss system so that perpetual motion could
>> occur without violating conservation of energy (and 100% efficiency).
>> All well and good but, even if you could this 100% efficiency (and you
>> can't) - then what?- all it could do is chase its own tail and be
>> incapable of doing any useful work which would appear as losses.
>>
>> Plonk
>>
>> --
>>
>> Don Kelly dhky@shawcross.ca
>> remove the X to answer
>>
>>
> Don tell me about gyroscopic forces and kinetic energy and how things that
> are in motion tend to stay in motion. Tell me about electromagnetic
> induction. and tell me the effects of driving a changing magnetic flux
> field through an induction coil.
> Then understand that the toroid armature consists of multiple changing
> flux fields going through 4 or by design variations multiple induction
> coils cyclic for infinity.
>
> The operational environment is ideal for the transformation of energy at a
> hyper extreem rate.
>
> Rubbish or not it's real. radius of a natural sine is a definition of
> unity and the most accurate if i might add.
> Peer review is the unique oppertunity.
>
> By your own confessions of just a brief review of the technology you
> understand that i am utilizing superconductance in the mechanism. That is
> un-precedented in the history of man as our knowledge and understanding is
> somewhat limited in the technology.

I see where you get the "radius of a natural sine" Unfortunately, you have
it backwards- all that is meant is that the (natural) sine function is
expressed in terms of a unit circle-simply because it is convenient to do so
(vertical component/radius is neater for radius =1). It could as easily be
defined in terms of a circle of radius "2.32" but that would be an
inconvenient nuisance and 1 is a much nicer number. So the fact that the
radius of a unit circle is 1 or unity simply means that it was defined that
way (hence "unit" circle). So all you are saying is that 1=1(exactly) in a
roundabout and rather obfuscating way- and saying:

"Unity is defined as the radius of a natural sine. Given the previous the
form toroid is unity by form alone."

is completely meaningless.

The rest of your statements are still gibberish. What you have is
essentially a toroidal transformer with multiple windings- with unspecified
connections (some shorted? and which may be superconductive (believe it or
not such transformers have been made but don't exhibit any tendency to have
a rotating core). There appears to be no basis for the contention that the
core will rotate. "Path of least resistance " is not actually a scientific
principle of use here (Coulomb's Law and some understanding of vectors
affecting are more applicable but won't help you), particularly as you are
implying a non-conductive core.

Anyhow, you can consider this about as good a peer review as you will
get -and probably the last - at least from me unless you can express
yourself more clearly and use technically appropriate language. Yes, I do
know about kinetic energy, inertia and gyroscopic forces (rusty on the gyro
, I admit ) and am well versed in the effects of changing magnetic fields in
a coil.
--

Don Kelly dhky@shawcross.ca
remove the X to answer