sci.physics.electromag

On Feb 19, 9:09 am, Peter Bowditch wrote:
> Benj wrote:
> >On Feb 18, 7:24 pm, Carl wrote:
> >> Can't we just put this thread to sleep ?
>
> >> Carl
>
> >Amen Carl! I'm already outta here. Tell John not to bother. Peter
> >is so stupid that he provides the replies to his nutty posts right in
> >the text he's posting! All you have to do is quote him to put him
> >down. Hopefully, nobody will quote him further.
>
> >ZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz.
>
> Narcolepsy?
>
> Still trying to blame spontaneous remission and the placebo effect on
> zappers?
>
> --
> Peter Bowditch aa #2243
> The Millenium Projecthttp://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
> Australian Council Against Health Fraudhttp://www.acahf.org.au
> Australian Skepticshttp://www.skeptics.com.au
> To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com






If you search you can find closed moderated discussion groups where
people are actively using this technology.

It's pretty obvious they are sick people, and that our medical
establishment left them to rot. If you are lucky you find some one who
had the same illness to help you. People almost never die from one
thing alone. Most often it's a combination of things.

Like your lies posted in this topic, we cant say those killed
everyone. But they did die much sooner thanks to the lies.

If any claimed to work cure is deliberately not investigated then the
people involved should loose their license.

journalism is not medicine.

Some may scream at sick people how they are in to quackery.They bend
the facts, are deliberately vague, make conclusions out of their
wallet.

Quackery is a derogatory term used to describe questionable medical
practices. According to Random House Dictionary, a "quack" is
considered a "fraudulent or ignorant pretender to medical skill" or "a
person who pretends, professionally or publicly, to have skill,
knowledge, or qualifications he or she does not possess;

This is quackery:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NY6UTnS6Z-A

And this is medical science:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-661201775015095955
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4712831998895427138
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6277107509272726216
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4897293122738659504
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1365612506774109869
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6523588049632078918

Not hard to see what is what?

This is perpetual motion:

http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?p=750
View topic - Perpetual motion made simple.

This is clean nuclear energy:

http://clean-nuclear-energy.go-here.nl

But what about energizing the water before consumption?

http://www.frank.germano.com/viktorschauberger_2.htm

Why wait for Rife therapy if you can prevent getting ill in the first
place?

Then what about silver colloids (colloidal silver)

the cockwack writes:
http://www.quackwatch.com/911QuackeryRelatedTopics/PhonyAds/silverad.html
"Colloidal silver is a suspension of submicroscopic metallic silver
particles in a colloidal base. Long-term use of silver preparations
can lead to argyria, a condition in which silver salts deposit in the
skin, eyes, and internal organs, and the skin turns ashen-gray."

Yes, and if you go outside you may get run over by cars. If you have
to much sex your cock may burst open. What is your point? As usual you
ignore the whole topic.

Colloidal silver is thousands of years old, it was outlawed because
the official research was never done. The lack of official research
created a frenzy of con artists.

Doing their job well the FDA kept a watchful eye on unethical
practices in the colloidal silver industry. But to banish every
product containing silver is just pure quackery.

NEWSFLASH: Colloidal silver is thousands of years older as the FDA!!
When is the FDA going to clean up THEIR act?

Never?

Do they seriously want ME to create their regulations? And pay for
them also?For example some one mentioned A colloidal silver
manufacturer with a single product, wishing to submit studies for
approval for only 10 claims, would need to conduct and submit 10
'individual studies' at a total expenditure of roughly ONE BILLION
DOLLARS!

It's a miracle nobody wanted to pay that! The internet is plastered
with people who used it. They claim it works, I claim that means it's
worth investigating the topic. A lack of proof doesn't make a valid
excuse not to look for proof.

I would like A nose spray that can cure a cold. Sure why not? I have
to pay millions for it? WTF??? It's just a cold FFS!!

The medical establishment claims not to have done any research on the
topic. Or shall we say they celebrate not doing the research on the
topic. A bit like physicist didn't look into perpetual motion devices
the last 500+ years.

The thousands of eye witnesses are all liars. Like when an ufo flies
over a town and there are 20 K witnesses. Then we may conclude they
are all delusional!

Yeah right!

So, tell us:

As there evidently isn't enough research done. What basis do you have
for your conclusions? A horse is a horse buddy! It seems to me that
insufficient research means insufficient research. And not something
else! I would love to see you try spin that around. You are making
medical claims you have no evidence of.

A quack is a person who pretends, professionally or publicly, to have
skill, knowledge, or qualifications he or she does not possess.

How colloidal silver nose drops cause Argyria?

You are making up stuff here? Are you 100% sure you are not talking
about SILVER NITRATE?

As it is your medical conclusion, you should make it evident.

Official channels say something vastly different from your quack page.
Is it forbidden because the workings have not been researched though
the official billion dollar channels.

Or do you want to argue it is because you have all the evidence you
need to show us it is dangerous to use it? It seems to me that if
there isn't sufficient evidence then there isn't sufficient evidence?

To pretend it's something different would be fraud.

Here is the perpetual motion device again.

http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?p=750
View topic - Perpetual motion made simple.

oh and other questions: You know Townsend brown? What about Pons and
Fleishman? Perhaps you can make up some cute lies about that also?
Where is our plasma reactor now? On the back of some guys lawn mower
in his garage you say?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5238596150388648518

But I want to travel around the galaxy with that! You with your
mortality fetish are not helping at all! Can you at least close this
US private reserve bank? Money should be printed by our governments
not by some private special interest group.

One more time the perpetual motion device.

http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?p=750
View topic - Perpetual motion made simple.

I know it doesn't look that way but I can assure you it's all very
closely related. Viruses also absorb resonant frequencies. They are
nanobots.

Colloidal silver particles also resonate. Thats why John Kanzius uses
them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRh4vwLJAiU

He also burns salt water!

I bet the perpetual motion fascists must be going nuts over this?

What about Stanley Meyer? What about Yull Brown? What about Daniel
Dingle? I remember how everyone welcomed the oxyhydrogen powered car.
*NOT*

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxyhydrogen

His research dealing with the thermal effect on gases shed light on
the properties of atomic hydrogen and resulted in the manufacture of
the atomic hydrogen torch used for welding. In atomic structure he
contributed to the modern theory of electronic bonding. For his
pioneer work in the fields of catalysis and adsorption Langmuir was
awarded the 1932 Nobel Prize for Chemistry.

The Nobel Prize for Chemistry?

Mix the shit with gasoline and you might just make it beyond 1000 MPG.

But who would want that?

Life is much to short?

The planet is much to small?

Right?