sci.physics.electromag

On Feb 21, 12:48=A0am, "gdewi...@gmail.com" wrote:
> On Feb 21, 4:28 am, "Don Kelly" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > ---------------------------- wrote in message
>
> >news:f062bc8a-3bd2-4482-80cb-fcb606f3672e@64g2000hsw.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > On Feb 20, 12:03 am, Bob Cain wrote:
>
> > >> "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
>
> > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 A. Einstein
>
> > > Cool, there is still some one propagating the lies of E.
>
> > > Well tell me Bobby.
>
> > > Is this simple enough for you?
>
> > >http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?p=3D750
> > > View topic - Perpetual motion made simple.
>
> > > I have done my homework well haven't I?
>
> > > Then now that you clearly agree we have all been livin-the-lie on just=

> > > about any topic you think you know something about, I think giving me
> > > your compliments would be appropriate here. =A0And thank me for giftin=
g
> > > you the invention of course. yes....
>
> > > Then I look forwards to your review there of when you have acquired
> > > the magnets to back up your claims.
>
> > > I claim the generalized doubt theorem doesn't hold against 20 sec
> > > experiments. Earth would become the center of the universe if that
> > > approach was credible.
>
> > > My thanks in advance.
>
> > -------------------------------
> > And how =A0does this cute little animation with weak narrative indicate
> > perpetual motion? =A0Perpetual motion would be easy =A0if one could buil=
d a
> > lossless system. So far nobody has done so. Of course, any attempt to
> > extract energy would bring it to a stop in any case.
> > --
>
> > Don Kelly d...@shawcross.ca
> > remove the X to answer
>
> Hello Don,
>
> Thanks for the review,
>
> (1680) mathematician, Claus Wagner, refused to view the Bessler wheel.
> He calculated that it was impossible and against all laws of physics
> so there was no point in even considering the possibility.
>
> I now calculate 300+ years this divine truth('S?!:) never had the
> pleasure of validation.
>
> But you are making it even worse aint ya? I understand you learn:
> "Because of the First Law of Thermodynamics, a Perpetual Motion
> Machine is impossible."
>
> But teh facts are that Helmholtz said: "Because a Perpetual Motion
> Machine is impossible, therefore the First Law of Thermodynamics;"

Well, it's also because of wanks like Helmholtz that
we invented the first law of robots. Which says that
the second law of thermodynamics never happened.
And the first law of lasers, which says that the
first law of thermodynamics was invented on
Monday for Sunday idiots.




>
> You swap the child and the parent.
>
> Sure additional proofs where searched for to further propagate
> established doctrine.
>
> But hey, if by law you never have to look at the alternatives it
> becomes awfully easy.
>
> I tried to answer your technical questions here under the cute
> animation. :-)
>
> http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?p=3D758#758
>
> Thanks,- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -