sci.physics.electromag

On Mar 3, 4:57=A0pm, "FrediFizzx" wrote:
> "Bill Miller" wrote in message
>
> news:MfXyj.699528$kj1.80670@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
>
>
> > "Eric Gisse" wrote in message
> >news:00568aeb-e6ef-4040-a6a3-ac268610294c@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com...=

> >> The only thing being demonstrated is ignorance. Nothing Jefimenko
> >> says
> >> can undo basic observation.
>
> > OK... please prove your staement. In particular, I'd like to know:
>
> > 1. What part of Jefimenko's "Causality" is in error, and how do you
> > demonstrate that?
>
> > 2. What "basic observation" can you cite that proves that, for
> > instance, an E field CAUSES an H field?
>
> The fact that electro-magnets work.
>
> Best,
>
> Fred Diether
> Co-moderator =A0sci.physics.foundations

Congrats, Fred. Go to the top of your class if you ever SEE a
magnetic field (or an electric one for that matter). All we ever see
are electrons & motion: the rest is theory.