sci.physics.particle

On Mar 31, 10:07=A0am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
> On Mar 30, 10:04=A0am, Kumar wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 30, 11:58=A0am, Kumar wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 30, 11:37=A0am, "Y.Porat" wrote:> On Mar =
30, 6:54=A0am, Kumar wrote:
>
> > > > > On > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > Instead, can GF be combined of two forces, one push force by its m=
otion
>
> > > > how =A0can =A0motion =A0cause push according to your guesses ??
>
> > > Somewhat =A0tornado or whirilpool type inward push.
>
> > > > > and other by earths magnetic force along with inersteller forces
>
> > > > i think you mingel =A0 too many factors
> > > > the magnwetic force is many orders of magnitude
> > > > stronger than Gravity
> > > > and OTHA =A0(note carefully)
> > > > **the range** of magnatic force is uncomparably
> > > > **shorter* than the Gravitaion force
> > > > another differnce between them is
> > > > that gravity cannot be screened
> > > > while magnetism can be screened
> > > > so it is very different 'birds' that i cant see
> > > > how they can cooperate
> > > > besides
>
> > > Yes, but I was unable to express atractive force of gravity along with=

> > > inward push force because attractive force can also be an magnetic and=

> > > inward push due to revolutions.> even masses that has no megnetism att=
ract each other
> > > > by gravity
> > > > so ...........????!!!
>
> > > It can be common result from all masses in earth. Non-magnetic
> > > substances can still have some forces.
>
> > > > ATB
> > > > Y.Porat
> > > > --------------------
> > > > s
>
> > > > > opreting on earth?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > ------------------------------ Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > To add;
> > "whirlpool =A0(hw=FBrl-)
>
> > =A0A rapidly rotating current of water; a vortex.
>
> > Turmoil; whirl.
> > A magnetic, impelling force into which one may be pulled.http://www.answ=
ers.com/topic/whirlpool?cat=3Dtechnology"- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> ------------------
> there is a principal differene between a 'vortex'
> and my Circlon idea:
>
> a vortex is done by =A0alot of material
> =A0around it
>
> the circlon can act even if it is *a single tiny lonely* particle
> it moves in a circle because 'that is how it was born'
> it is its initial property
> it does not need anything external to it
> to move in a circle
> is that principle understood ??
> (it is a parallel /replacing =A0the 'curved space- time idea .....)
>
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> --------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Thanks. But can't gravity be a combination of vortex & Circlon?