sci.physics.particle

On Mar 27, 12:31=A0pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
> On Mar 27, 5:45=A0am, Kumar wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 26, 12:14=A0pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > > Can we just related four forces mediating these nature's law/
> > > > initiations. I think, gravity may be relevant to "nature balances
> > > > itself". :)
> > A
> > > ---------------
> > > 'see the 'chain of orbitals' ides
>
> > > Y.Porat
> > > -------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Pls tell me more about it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> ----------------
> anyone who saw my model
> saw it graphycally and symbolically
> anyway
> i can try and describe it by afew words:
>
> the thesis is that
> orbitals as known now are sort of closed curves
> now my innovative idea is that
> those orbitals are not just separated single entities
> but can as well combine to a
> ;Chain of orbitals' !!
> if you like some simlistic methaphore:
> like the human =A0 invented chain of say links
> waht is special in that chain ?? a few things
> 1
> since we agree that any orbital is something dymanic
> somethings that move in that curved criture-
> nothin can interfere in its path or else it will collide and
> be distroyed mutually
> so
> if liks 'whants to combine'
> they must live inpeace witheachother
> ie not to interfere one with the path of the other
> the simplest arangment that one can thing
> ios that those links are connected one inside the other
> *inj a diffrent plan**(similar to =A0the uman =A0invented chain is )
>
> now comes another forwards step =A0revolutionary suggestion
> that actually is inevitable by my findings about the
> atom and nuc structre :
>
> *it is not only that the orbitals *of the same order* can link
>
> EVEN ORBITALS OF DIFFERENT ORDERS- CAN LINK !!
>
> =A0so back to practice:
> lets take an example
> if the electyron is an orbital
> and a nuclear particle is anorbital as well
> they can link as i described above to
> =A0A CHAIN OF ORBITALS !!
>
> =A0sop waht is the innovation here??
>
> the nuclear orbital is not controlling the electron orbital
> by sort of a mysterious remote control but ...
> by immediate thouch and connection =A0between them !!
> and btw
> it explaines nicely the facts known
> that strong forces are becoming stronger while some
> strech is done on the chain
> but is the chain is overcome and breaks
> the stron force imediately and suddenly disapear!!
> (like the human chain
> it has some freedom of movemen along some distance
> but if you strech it very hard it beraks suddeny
> iow
> it explained the stron force as very strong but....
> only a very short range !!
> beyond that range it ' suddenly does not exist'
> 2
> i found in my reasurch
> that there is not only a nuclear strong force connected to the
> electron
> but
> there is some MEDIATING UKNOWN =A0ORBITAL
> =A0that i called the medium orbitalt that makes it 3 links
> 3
> no that idea goes evenfurther
> i suggest and guess that even the neutrino
> is another link on that chain of orbitals
> 4
> oh yes i forgot to say that the =A0links of the orbitals on the chain
> become bigger in range but smaller in mass
> as they are located furtheraway =A0from the base strong orbilal
>
> so how do you like that new(revolutionary =A0idea ??
>
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> ------------------------ Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

and do you mean, that medium orbital is gravitational force?