sci.physics.particle

On Apr 9, 5:07=A0am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
> On Apr 8, 3:47=A0am, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
> > On Apr 7, 4:56=A0pm, "terrylhewettsr" wrote:
>
> > > "uri" wrote in message
>
> > >news:b0e60d3d-fd95-4e7b-b7dd-4d7b865c742c@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com.=
..
>
> > > > In physics forum they ban people forever. Why ban forever? Why not
> > > > give a person a second chance?
>
> > > It's academia's way or the highway. Unfortunately academia has reached=
a
> > > dead end. very few new discoveries will be made if academia doesn't st=
art
> > > listening to the laymen. It is the ones doing the banning that is grev=
ously
> > > wrong.
>
> > What could the ignorant hope to contribute to a highly technical field?
>
> ----------------
> and what are the contributions of the little
> pompous farter Gisse ??
> (and other little =A0 parrots ??!!)
> 2
> now to the question what was the last contribution
> of a ;'''noneducated' to science ??:
>
> Michael faradey contributed to sci and** our well fair**
> much more than most 'educated ' =A0'modern scientists
> and had i tried hard to find more beside Faradey
> i could add a lot
> i am sure other readers could ad more on the long =A0list
>
> 3
> to show that some of 'modern physics
> is pompous bullshit
> is not least a contribution for the advance of science
> for example
>
> curved space time
> virtuall massless particle
> massless energy
> shell structure of heavy Atoms
>
> etc etc etc
>
> ATB
> Y.Porat
> --------------------------------

xxein: OK. you are posting.

Tell us something that we should consider or reconsider.