sci.physics.particle

On Feb 19, 9:56=A0pm, Igor wrote:
> On Feb 19, 5:14=A0am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 18, 8:37=A0pm, Igor wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 18, 2:55=A0am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 17, 7:18=A0pm, Igor wrote:
>
> > > > > On Feb 17, 4:34=A0am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Feb 16, 7:41=A0pm, Igor wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Feb 16, 2:48=A0am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Feb 15, 8:28=A0pm, Igor wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > On Feb 15, 10:54=A0am, "Y.Porat" wro=
te:
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Feb 14, 7:16=A0pm, Igor wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 13, 4:19=A0am, "Y.Porat" =
wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 12, 9:28=A0pm, Igor wro=
te:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 12, 3 research ??
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > TIA
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Y.Porat
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > > > > > are **you** =A0 =A0 Igor the moderatror
> > > > > > > > > > > > in sci.physics.research ??
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > TIA
> > > > > > > > > > > > Y.Porat
>
> > > > > > > > > > ------------------
> > > > > > > > > > no !
> > > > > > > > > > i dont need (lawyers trickes ) =A0 devious reasonings wh=
ile there is
> > > > > > > > > > a direct simple unsmarting posibility to answer:
>
> > > > > > > > > > are **you ** 'Igor * =A0the moderator of
> > > > > > > > > > sci.physicsresaerch ??
>
> > > > > > > > > > TIA
> > > > > > > > > > Y.Porat
>
> > > > > > > > > Do your homework and then tell me.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > ----------------------
> > > > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > it is obvious that your are afraied to answer the question
> > > > > > > > ie
> > > > > > > > sort of
> > > > > > > > if you will answer a simple legitimate question
> > > > > > > > your private interests might be hurt ??
>
> > > > > > > > Y.Porat
>
> > > > > > > Ok, I give in. =A0I'm not him. =A0But if you had not been so s=
tupid and
> > > > > > > lazy, you could have found that out for yourself. =A0I find it=

> > > > > > > tremendously amusing that you claim to understand the answers =
to the
> > > > > > > mysteries of the universe, but investigating a simple usenet i=
d stumps
> > > > > > > you to your core.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > -------------------
> > > > > > i told you that peiole can post from differnt locations
> > > > > > ones they have crookish reasons to do it
> > > > > > and we dont miss crooks in our world
> > > > > > see for instance the little 24 years as he claimes ...) pigg shi=
t
> > > > > > Gisse
> > > > > > (i just wonder if really a 24 yeasrs man can be such a =A0distur=
bed
> > > > > > crook and piggshit ...in such a short time ...)
> > > > > > 2
> > > > > > =A0anyway =A0 =A0 -- thanks
>
> > > > > > 3
> > > > > > my wonders are still on
> > > > > > 4
> > > > > > if you are a real scientist
> > > > > > you should know that not anything on saies
> > > > > > is real or honest or thru
> > > > > > so even you might still cheat
>
> > > > > > 5
>
> > > > > > as a scientist you should know that
> > > > > > in manycases =A0itis not the first alterbnative that
> > > > > > comes into your mind
> > > > > > or somebidies else mind =A0or 'looks right - is the right one of=
the
> > > > > > absolute thruth
>
> > > > > > 6
> > > > > > now i had other questions:
>
> > > > > > who is nominating the sci.physics.research moderstors ??
>
> > > > > That would be the exalted king of usenet himself. =A0By the way,
> > > > > congratulations on his nominating you for moderator for
> > > > > alt.twits.are.us.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > ----------------------
> > > > the Bolshevic still ddint answer my question
>
> > > > a real serious human being
> > > > while asked a question and he does not know
> > > > will stay aside and let others answer
> > > > a bolshevic
> > > > will smartguy =A0 (that is more a crook lawyer
> > > > rather than a serious scientist)
> > > > and answer unrelevant answers
>
> > > > iow
> > > > once a Bolshevic-- always a Bolshevic =A0 (:-)
>
> > > > now i still wait for an answer
> > > > **from whom who knowes:**
>
> > > > who is nominating the sci.research moderators ??
> > > > or may be they are nominating themselves ???!!
>
> > > > TIA
> > > > Y.Porat
>
> > > Create your own ng and you can moderate it yourself. =A0It's that
> > > simple. =A0But apparently not simple enough for you. =A0And you're pre=
tty
> > > simple.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --------------------
> > =A0i asked a simple question
> > who is =A0nominationg the moderators of =A0the sci.research ng
>
> > if you cant answer a simple question
> > just keep away dont smartguy
> > we already know that you are too much
> > of a smartguy and a parrot physicist
> > and a nice manipolator
> > so jsut leave it for others to answer =A0a =A0simple question
>
> > TIA
> > Y.Porat
>
> Actually, I already pretty much explained it to you. =A0Unless you're
> not smart enough to understand it. =A0People who start their own ngs
> have the option to moderate it themselves (unless they choose others
> to moderate it for them). =A0What's so hard about understanding that?- Hid=
e quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

---------------
i understoo that
yet i whanted to be more specific !!

you see
if people of sci.research are niominationg themselves
or their friends
it should be known and obvious !!
guess why??

becuase in that case
that all ng is LESS VALUABLE !!

becuase it a closed party result
a limitedin is tallent knowlwdge and possibilities
if you ddint get it
i wil give a methaphore
su[ppose someone opens a ng valid only for
the popel of say the Vatican people
or even ny city people
it will be less valuable and reliable than
for instance it will be open to all the people of the US
got the idea ??
one of the main game(and the secret of achievements !!)
of democracy
(unlike Bolshevism ..)
is
TRANSPARACY!! (and a fee and equal chance
for everybody !!

ATB
Y.Porat
---------------