"Y.Porat"
news:f75e789d-ba94-4226-a55f-7810fb79e6f2@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 25, 5:19 pm, "Cork Soaker"
> "Y.Porat"
>
> news:8a4efc19-88f3-4338-8730-bc42d559dc2d@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 23, 3:32 am, Uncle Al
>
>
>
>
>
> > higis wrote:
>
> > > Hi,
>
> > > Lead has atomic number of 82. Gold 79. What would
> > > it take to remove the 3 protons and neutrons in the lead
> > > to turn it to Gold?
>
> > [snip]
>
> > Learn how to knap flint, then scale down proportionately.
>
> > --
> > Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> > (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most
> > mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
>
> ------------------
> you are mumbling about things
> you know very little:
>
> in principle
> it is right that Lead and Gold has the same basic nuclear skeleton
> yet there is some difference in their **edge orbitals*
>
> a cording to well subsatntiated nuclear model:
>
> as a saied the main skeleton is the same
> the difference is th eedgges that are :
>
> on lead
> there are two deutron chain of orbitaksplus
> a proton neutron couple
> (neotron on one dide proton in the opposite side
> of the 'rectangular pipe ' skeleton)
> al l thaton e one pole
> on thr opposite pole :
> just a neutron - proton couple
>
> on Gold it is
> the same main skeleton but :
>
> neutron proton couple plus two opposite neutrons
> on one pole
> and
>
> just two neutrons on the other pole:
>
> so it is not jsut as the op poster immagines
>
> the nucleus is not just a ;porridge ' of neutrons and protons
> it is an imazingly acurate geopetric structure
> any cghane even just in location of edge orbitals
> makes completely diferent properties !!
> if you like it remides something
> about the much more comlicated principle of
> or ganic matter
> the geometric structure is 'fatally ' important!!
>
> the fucken qm has not and cannot have the slightest idea
> about it
> because it is too abstract :
> (like trying to describe and build an organic compound
> just by the knowlwdgeof QM (abstract formulas !!)
> they are far away from it as earth from mars
> and may be even firther !!
>
> so it is not a question of just final energy calculations
> it must be brought to the needed 'factory'
> (of medocines (:-)
> in order to change lead to gold
> of course it can be done just by **a wild chance**
> of a nuclear process!(like an accidental guess
> tha tlater no ne remembers how it was done all along the process.
> BTW
> mensioning the Gold and noble atoms
> i fould that it is not the magic dorn of
> 'completing a shell"
> thje motre basic secret of it is
> **structuralsymetry** of
> protons neutrons
> deutrons of two kinds
> (th edeutron has a head and a taile side
> depends of its free side is a proton or neutron--
> the two situation exists all along the periodic table
> inmany cases
> so those specific edge particles
> locateed in some symetry
> makes them noble (hard top breake the strong
> symetric structure
> OTHOH
> lackof symetry
> makes an Atom more active and 'changable '
> so i geve you hear
> jsut the tip of the iceberg to have some idea
> were are you and others about real
> much more intensive knowledge ..
> (thoise who saw my site
> can have some idea about whati am talking about
> others ....
> no chance ..
> it should take many months tolearn it
>
> Y.Porat
> -----------------------
>
> How are you meant to read this? Employ a spell checker!- Hide quoted
> text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
------------------
actually it is not a problem of English
it is a problem that i cant explain it just in words
had i some graphyc tools
and i was standing before you
explaning and answer on live questions
it could be unserstood
anyway]
it is something you never before saw in your life
people who saw my site cold have some clue
so just remember the bottom line
there is a whole world about the strructure of matter
that is still far from the common knwledge
Y.P
----------------------
No, really it isn't, it's too difficult to figure out what you're supposed
to be typing.
Please, use a spellchecker.