sci.physics.particle

"Autymn D. C." wrote in message
news:b11c2d05-e1c4-47d7-899e-e6476439f8a6@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 28, 12:59 am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" wrote:
>> Evidence for black hole nucleus splitting and pairing inside several
>> nebula.
>>
>> The peculiar supernova remnants (M1 the Crab nebula and N63a,
>> containing the form of a the dead Fox) are a support for the NEW Black
>> Hole hypothesis that newly formed black hole S-Nova nuclei are able to
>> explode and split to smaller nuclei.
>> This happens only if the Higgs oscillatory pressure on the BH-nucleus
>> is changing and is no more in equilibrium with the black hole nuclear
>> internal particle pressure. The resulting "curved PILLARS" seem to
>> form pairs and show a "fork figure"-see the white arrows- by gas tail
>> propulsion (as is assumed for "NEW" black holes).
>> See:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
>> As a consequence this phenomenon of black hole splitting and pairing
>> seems to be the main origin of complexity also inside other nebula
>> ( like Carina and Eagle etc.)
>> Secondly this phenomenon could be the main origin of complexity inside
>> the universe even at different scales from the evaporating nuclear
>> black hole Big Bang down to nebulae. Author: Leo Vuyk.
>>
>> Leo Vuyk.
>
> No, Leo, there are no black holes. Anywhere.
>
> Chandrasekar was wrong.
> Schwarzschild was wrong.
> Kerr was wrong.
> Hawking was wrong.
> CERN/LHC/ILC were wrong.

And your evidence that these great physicists were wrong, and rather that
you (who is a physicist) alone are right Is ... ???