sci.physics.particle

On 2 mrt, 11:15, "Autymn D. C." wrote:
> On Mar 1, 8:42=A0pm, "Artful" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Autymn D. C." wrote in messagenews:b11c2d05-e1=
c4-47d7-899e-e6476439f8a6@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > On Feb 28, 12:59 am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" wrote:
> > >> Evidence for black hole nucleus splitting and pairing inside several
> > >> nebula.
>
> > >> The peculiar supernova remnants (M1 the Crab nebula and N63a,
> > >> containing the form of a the dead Fox) are a support for the NEW Blac=
k
> > >> Hole hypothesis that newly formed black hole S-Nova nuclei are able t=
o
> > >> explode and split to smaller nuclei.
> > >> This happens only if the Higgs oscillatory pressure on the BH-nucleus=

> > >> is changing and is no more in equilibrium with the black hole nuclear=

> > >> internal particle pressure. =A0The resulting "curved PILLARS" seem to=

> > >> form pairs and show a "fork figure"-see the white arrows- by gas tail=

> > >> propulsion (as is assumed for "NEW" black holes).
> > >> See:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
> > >> As a consequence this phenomenon of black hole splitting and pairing
> > >> seems to be the main origin of complexity also inside other nebula
> > >> ( like Carina and Eagle etc.)
> > >> Secondly this phenomenon could be the main origin of complexity insid=
e
> > >> the universe even at different scales from the evaporating nuclear
> > >> black hole Big Bang down to nebulae. Author: Leo Vuyk.
>
> > >> Leo Vuyk.
>
> > > No, Leo, there are no black holes. =A0Anywhere.
>
> > > Chandrasekar was wrong.
> > > Schwarzschild was wrong.
> > > Kerr was wrong.
> > > Hawking was wrong.
> > > CERN/LHC/ILC were wrong.
>
> > And your evidence that these great physicists were wrong, and rather tha=
t
> > you (who is a physicist) alone are right Is ... ???
>
> in my links. =A0Can you not read?
>
> The Schwarzschild radius is a /classic/ solution, whereas the black
> hole is a relativistic object. =A0It was already rejected thas element
> 137 be a el=E8ctric black hole, as its predictrix was a classic
> (Newtonian) ratio--some silly deal with the fine structure constant.
>
> -Aut- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -
>
> - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -

May I suggest that quarks are compound particles based on electrons-
positrons and gluon-photons?
see:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2007/01/introduction.html

If fermions are propeller shaped particles and balck hole horzons are
able to FLIP their spin state.
THEN my NEW black hole is able to make such weird pillars as insiccs
N63a and the Crab and Carina and the Eagle etc.
Or are the base for Comets and ball lightning.

Leo Vuyk.