sci.physics.particle

On Feb 28, 12:59 am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" wrote:
> Evidence for black hole nucleus splitting and pairing inside several
> nebula.
>
> The peculiar supernova remnants (M1 the Crab nebula and N63a,
> containing the form of a the dead Fox) are a support for the NEW Black
> Hole hypothesis that newly formed black hole S-Nova nuclei are able to
> explode and split to smaller nuclei.
> This happens only if the Higgs oscillatory pressure on the BH-nucleus
> is changing and is no more in equilibrium with the black hole nuclear
> internal particle pressure. The resulting "curved PILLARS" seem to
> form pairs and show a "fork figure"-see the white arrows- by gas tail
> propulsion (as is assumed for "NEW" black holes). See:http://bigbang-entan=
glement.blogspot.com/
> As a consequence this phenomenon of black hole splitting and pairing
> seems to be the main origin of complexity also inside other nebula
> ( like Carina and Eagle etc.)
> Secondly this phenomenon could be the main origin of complexity inside
> the universe even at different scales from the evaporating nuclear
> black hole Big Bang down to nebulae. Author: Leo Vuyk.
>
> Leo Vuyk.

No, Leo, there are no black holes. Anywhere.

Chandrasekar was wrong.
Schwarzschild was wrong.
Kerr was wrong.
Hawking was wrong.
CERN/LHC/ILC were wrong.

http://google.com/groups?q=3DAutymn+fast-food+black-holes

The end of giant stars is a neutronic or quarktly core--the heaviest
would be smaller and heftier quark-glu=F2n-glueball-technihadr=F2n
compounds. And the coolest would be a relativistic dark star--lik the
classic dark star but without the event horizon--or, in other words, a
dark dwarf or infrared dwarf. This is due to gravital redshift, and
is why these bodies can't be seen. If they are excellent unificators,
they will be mostly clear matter--which the dumb community calls dark
matter--and will be even more invisibil.

-Aut