sci.physics.particle

On Mar 25, 11:06=A0pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
> On Mar 26, 5:48=A0am, "Pmb" wrote:
>
>
>
> > wrote in message
>
> >news:f4d1cb91-a8de-4847-8a80-009869c28d5d@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> > On Mar 25, 5:46 pm, "hhc...@yahoo.com" wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 25, 8:33 pm, mitchg...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > When inside the nucleus protons and neutrons have less mass than whe=
n
> > > > unbound. When the nucleons become bound part of their mass becomes t=
he
> > > > binding energy of the strong force holding them together. Upon leavi=
ng
> > > > the nucleus they get back their mass. The binding energy mass goes
> > > > back into the protons and neutrons as they leave the strong force's
> > > > range.
>
> > > > Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
>
> > > You know this because of this evidence?
>
> > > Harry C.
>
> > > p.s., Mitch, have you ever though about stamp collecting as a hobby,
> > > rather than posting nonsense on sci.physics?
>
> > > Harry C.
> > >Nucleons outside of the nucleus measure as more massive. That their
> > >mass becomes the binding eneergy of the strong force is my theory. It
> > >is rather straightforword if I may say so myself. :-)
>
> > >Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
>
> > This is very wrong. You're confusing the mass of the nucleons with the m=
ass
> > of the fields holding the nucleus together. The fields themselves have m=
ass
> > and that is the source of the mass defect.
>
> > Pete- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> -------------
> very nice
> i can see some advance
>
> NO MASS NO REAL PHYSICS !! =A0 =A0 (said old Catto (:-)
> =A0even fields has mass !!

How come Maxwell's equations describe macroscopic electric and
magnetic fields exactly without mass?

> the same as photons =3D has mass
> and there is just one kind of mass ......
> and the above nuclear procecess are just *one*
> of the proves for it !.
>
> ATB
> Y.Porat
> ----------------------